Literature DB >> 22174549

Failed biliary cannulation: clinical and technical outcomes after tertiary referral endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Michael P Swan1, Michael J Bourke, Stephen J Williams, Sina Alexander, Alan Moss, Rick Hope, David Ruppin.   

Abstract

AIM: Prospective evaluation of repeat endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for failed Schutz grade 1 biliary cannulation in a high-volume center.
METHODS: Prospective intention-to-treat analysis of patients referred for biliary cannulation following recent unsuccessful ERCP.
RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (35 female; mean age: 62.5 years; age range: 40-87 years) with previous failed biliary cannulation were referred for repeat ERCP. The indication for ERCP was primarily choledocholithiasis (45%) or pancreatic malignancy (18%). Successful biliary cannulation was 100%. The precut needle knife sphincterotomy (NKS) rate was 27.4%. Complications occurred in 3.9% (post-ERCP pancreatitis). An identifiable reason for initial unsuccessful biliary cannulation was present in 55% of cases. Compared to a cohort of 940 naïve papilla patients (female 61%; mean age: 59.9 years; age range: 18-94 years) who required sphincterotomy over the same time period, there was no statistical difference in the cannulation success rate (100% vs 98%) or post-ERCP pancreatitis (3.1% vs 3.9%). Precut NKS use was more frequent (27.4% vs 12.7%) (P = 0.017).
CONCLUSION: Referral to a high-volume center following unsuccessful ERCP is associated with high technical success, with a favorable complication rate, compared to routine ERCP procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biliary cannulation; Failed biliary cannulation; Failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Needle knife sphincterotomy; Post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis; Precut sphincterotomy; Tertiary referral endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Unsuccessful biliary cannulation

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22174549      PMCID: PMC3236589          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i45.4993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  30 in total

1.  Success of ERCP at a referral center after a previously unsuccessful attempt.

Authors:  C P Choudari; S Sherman; E L Fogel; S Phillips; A Kochell; J Flueckiger; G A Lehman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 2.  Evidence-based assessment: patient, procedure, or operator factors associated with ERCP complications.

Authors:  Naomi Aronson; Carole R Flamm; Rhonda L Bohn; David H Mark; Theodore Speroff
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 3.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus.

Authors:  P B Cotton; G Lehman; J Vennes; J E Geenen; R C Russell; W C Meyers; C Liguory; N Nickl
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Long-term results of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage for benign and malignant bile duct strictures.

Authors:  P Born; T Rösch; A Triptrap; E Frimberger; H D Allescher; R Ott; N Weigert; R Lorenz; M Classen
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.423

5.  ERCP: a review of technical competency and workload in a small unit.

Authors:  M M Schlup; S M Williams; G O Barbezat
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Success and yield of second attempt ERCP.

Authors:  S Kumar; S Sherman; R H Hawes; G A Lehman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 7.  Experience with 647 consecutive tumors of the duodenum, ampulla, head of the pancreas, and distal common bile duct.

Authors:  F Michelassi; F Erroi; P J Dawson; A Pietrabissa; S Noda; M Handcock; G E Block
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Failed biliary access following needle knife fistulotomy: is repeat interval ERCP worthwhile?

Authors:  David Kevans; Faisal Zeb; Fergal Donnellan; Gary Courtney; Abdur R Aftab
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.423

9.  Comparison of standard and steerable catheters for bile duct cannulation in ERCP.

Authors:  H-U Laasch; A Tringali; L Wilbraham; A Marriott; R E England; M Mutignani; V Perri; G Costamagna; D F Martin
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Therese A Stukel; Andrea E Siewers; Philip P Goodney; David E Wennberg; F Lee Lucas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-11-27       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  A Multidisciplinary Approach to Pancreas Cancer in 2016: A Review.

Authors:  Evan L Fogel; Safi Shahda; Kumar Sandrasegaran; John DeWitt; Jeffrey J Easler; David M Agarwal; Mackenzie Eagleson; Nicholas J Zyromski; Michael G House; Susannah Ellsworth; Ihab El Hajj; Bert H O'Neil; Attila Nakeeb; Stuart Sherman
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  ERCP PERFORMANCE IN A TERTIARY BRAZILIAN CENTER: FOCUS ON NEW RISK FACTORS, COMPLICATIONS AND QUALITY INDICATORS.

Authors:  Alana Costa Borges; Paulo César de Almeida; Stella Maria Torres Furlani; Marcelo de Sousa Cury; Douglas K Pleskow
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2018-06-21

3.  Intractable Biliary Candidiasis in Patients with Obstructive Jaundice and Regional Malignancy: A Retrospective Case Series.

Authors:  Abdel Rahman A Al Manasra; Khaled Jadallah; Abdelwahab Aleshawi; Mamoon Al-Omari; Mwaffaq Elheis; Ahmad Reyad; Jehad Fataftah; Hamzeh Al-Domaidat
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-03-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.