Literature DB >> 22174343

The biomechanical and clinical application of using the anterior half of the peroneus longus tendon as an autograft source.

Jinzhong Zhao1, Xiaoqiao Huangfu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The shortage of autogenous grafts has often times been a problem in knee ligament reconstruction. There are little data concerning the use of the anterior half of the peroneus longus tendon (AHPLT) as an autograft. HYPOTHESIS: The AHPLT is a suitable graft with respect to its strength, safety, and donor site morbidity. STUDY
DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study and case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: The safety and efficacy of using the AHPLT as an autograft source were evaluated. A cadaveric study was first done to reveal the anatomic profile of the AHPLT, to test its failure load, and to compare it with that of the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons. Then, a cadaveric harvest study was performed to show it was safe and reproducible. The space between the tendon stripper and the peroneal nerve during harvesting of the AHPLT was evaluated. Lastly, a clinical study was performed to evaluate donor site morbidity. The preoperative and postoperative foot and ankle functions of 92 patients who underwent a variety of knee ligament reconstructions with the AHPLT were followed for more than 2 years and were then evaluated using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale and the Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) to determine the influence of tendon removal on ankle and foot function.
RESULTS: The average failure load of the AHPLT was 322.35 ± 63.18 N, accounting for 97.69% ± 19.48% and 147.94% ± 41.30% of the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons, respectively. During tendon harvesting, the distance between the head of the tendon stripper and the branching point of the deep peroneus nerve was 4.6 to 10.4 cm. The clinical study showed that the preoperative and postoperative AOFAS scores were 97.4 ± 2.0 and 97.2 ± 1.6 (P = .85), respectively, while the FADI scores preoperatively and postoperatively were 96.8 ± 2.2 and 96.9 ± 2.5 (P = .91), respectively. No signs of peroneus nerve injury, peroneus longus tendon rupture, or tendinopathy were found.
CONCLUSION: The AHPLT is acceptable for use as an autograft with respect to its strength, safety, and donor site morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22174343     DOI: 10.1177/0363546511428782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  23 in total

1.  Lateral ankle ligament reconstruction using the anterior half of the peroneus longus tendon.

Authors:  Hyong Nyun Kim; June Young Jeon; Quanyu Dong; Kyu Cheol Noh; Kook Jin Chung; Hong Kyun Kim; Ji Hyo Hwang; Yong Wook Park
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Peroneus longus tendon autograft has functional outcomes comparable to hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jinshen He; Qi Tang; Sara Ernst; Monica A Linde; Patrick Smolinski; Song Wu; Freddie Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-09-27       Impact factor: 4.114

3.  Peroneus Longus Tendon Autograft versus Hamstring Tendon Autograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparative Study with a Mean Follow-up of Two Years.

Authors:  Sohrab Keyhani; Mohamad Qoreishi; Maryam Mousavi; Hossein Ronaghi; Mehran Soleymanha
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2022-08

4.  [Arthroscopic GraftLink technique reconstruction combined with suture anchor fixation for anterior cruciate ligament and medial collateral ligament injuries].

Authors:  Cheng Wu; Guoqing Xie; Wenxiao Jin; Zhongming Ren; Jun Xue; Kun Yang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-06-15

5.  [Clinical study on reconstruction of posterior cruciate ligament with platelet rich plasma combined with 3-strand peroneus longus tendons].

Authors:  Shichun Wu; Wenxiang Lin; Weihua Xu; Honghan Li
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-06-15

6.  Peroneus Longus Tendon Autograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Safe and Effective Alternative in Nonathletic Patients.

Authors:  Sachin Joshi; Utsav C Shetty; M D Salim; Naveen Meena; R Shiva Kumar; Varush K V Rao
Journal:  Niger J Surg       Date:  2021-03-09

7.  [Lateral ligament reconstruction with autogenous partial peroneus longus tendon for chronic lateral ankle instability].

Authors:  Yuehai Pan; Zhigang Qu; Benjun Bi; Fei Gao; Heng Huang; Quanyu Dong
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-09-15

8.  Anterior Half of the Peroneus Longus Tendon Combined with Semitendinosus and Gracilis Tendons for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Athlete Case Report.

Authors:  Diego Escudeiro de Oliveira; Melanie Mayumi Horita; Marconde de Oliveira E Silva; Victor Eduardo Roman Salas; Pedro Baches Jorge
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2021-06-24

9.  Can we use peroneus longus in addition to hamstring tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?

Authors:  Khalilallah Nazem; Mohammadreza Barzegar; Alireza Hosseini; Mohammadtaghi Karimi
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2014-05-19

10.  All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an Anterior Half of the Peroneus Longus Tendon Autograft.

Authors:  Mingguang Bi; Chen Zhao; Qiong Zhang; Li Cao; Xinji Chen; Mingxiang Kong; Qing Bi
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-06-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.