Literature DB >> 22173822

Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LASH), a retrospective study of 1,584 cases regarding intra- and perioperative complications.

Dietmar Grosse-Drieling1, Julia Caroline Schlutius, Christopher Altgassen, Katharina Kelling, Juliane Theben.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The main interest of this study was to assess the rate of intraoperative and perioperative complications of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LASH) in a teaching hospital.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 1,584 laparoscopic assisted hysterectomies between 2005 and 2010 by different surgeons.
RESULTS: In 2,577 patients undergoing simple hysterectomy, an indication for LASH was present in 1,584 cases. Indications were uterine myomas (71.6%), dysfunctional uterine bleeding (12.6%), suspicion of adenomyosis uteri (8.9%), descensus uteri (2.8%), dysmenorrhea (2.8%), hysterectomy on demand (1.2%) and benign hyperplasia of the endometrium (0.2%). Mean duration of the procedure was 76.5 ± 33.4 min (95% CI, ± 1.66). The average age of patients was 45.9 ± 5.4 years (95% CI, ± 0.27). Mean body mass index (BMI) was 25.3 ± 4.9 (95% CI, ± 0.24). Adhesiolysis due to earlier surgery had to be performed in 190 (12%) cases. The total complication rate was 1.07%. The total conversion rate to laparotomy was 0.88%. The rate of conversion after laparoscopic assessment of the situs was 0.57%. In five cases, conversion to laparotomy was necessary due to intraoperative complications (0.32%). On the whole, six bleedings (0.38%), four bladder injuries (0.25%), three intestinal injuries (0.19%), one ureter injury (0.06%), one injury of the epigastric vein (0.06%) and two omental incarcerations (0.13%) occurred.
CONCLUSION: In this retrospective analysis, the rate of complications for LASH was very low in a hospital of standard care and residency. LASH has to be considered as a minimally invasive method with a low perioperative morbidity to treat benign uterine pathologies even in a teaching setting and should therefore be the method of choice if the cervix can be preserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22173822     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-011-2170-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  4 in total

1.  Cervical Detachment Using Monopolar SupraLoop™ Electrode versus Monopolar Needle in Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy (LSH): An Interventional, Comparative Cohort Study.

Authors:  S Brucker; R Rothmund; B Krämer; F Neis; B Schönfisch; W Zubke; F A Taran; M Wallwiener
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  The influence of persistent bleeding after supracervical hysterectomy on depressive and anxious symptoms: a prospective bicenter study.

Authors:  Carolin Spüntrup; M Banerjee; J Piana; M Hellmich; J Bojahr; B Bojahr; C Albus; G Noé
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Systematic review of urological injury during caesarean section and hysterectomy.

Authors:  Gavin Wei; Frances Harley; Michael O'Callaghan; James Adshead; Derek Hennessey; Ned Kinnear
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 1.932

4.  Case report of ovarian torsion mimicking ovarian cancer as an uncommon late complication of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Michał Ciebiera; Arkadiusz Baran; Aneta Słabuszewska-Jóźwiak; Grzegorz Jakiel
Journal:  Prz Menopauzalny       Date:  2017-02-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.