C H Toh1, K-C Wei, S-H Ng, Y-L Wan, M Castillo, C-P Lin. 1. Departments of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Linkou, Taiwan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: TDLs may be indistinguishable from high-grade gliomas on conventional MR imaging. The role of DTI in differentiating TDLs from high-grade gliomas is not clear, and quantitative comparison between the 2 has not been reported. Here we aimed to differentiate TDLs from high-grade gliomas by using DTI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DTI was performed in 8 TDLs and 13 high-grade gliomas. The presence of 3 findings (ie, intralesional hyperintensities on the FA map, restricted diffusion in the lesion periphery, and a perilesional hyperintense FA rim) was assessed by visual inspection. The FA and MD values were measured in the central nonenhancing portion, peripheral enhancing portion, and perilesional edema for each lesion and compared between the 2 groups respectively. RESULTS: TDLs had a significantly higher incidence of intralesional hyperintensities on FA maps (P = .049) but a lower incidence of a perilesional hyperintense FA rim (P < .001), compared with those of high-grade gliomas on visual inspection. TDLs had significantly higher FA (P = .004) and lower MD (P = .001) values in the peripheral enhancing portions of the lesions compared with those of high-grade gliomas. In perilesional edema, FA values were significantly higher in high-grade gliomas (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: DTI is helpful in differentiating TDLs from high-grade gliomas by using visual inspection and quantitative analysis.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: TDLs may be indistinguishable from high-grade gliomas on conventional MR imaging. The role of DTI in differentiating TDLs from high-grade gliomas is not clear, and quantitative comparison between the 2 has not been reported. Here we aimed to differentiate TDLs from high-grade gliomas by using DTI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DTI was performed in 8 TDLs and 13 high-grade gliomas. The presence of 3 findings (ie, intralesional hyperintensities on the FA map, restricted diffusion in the lesion periphery, and a perilesional hyperintense FA rim) was assessed by visual inspection. The FA and MD values were measured in the central nonenhancing portion, peripheral enhancing portion, and perilesional edema for each lesion and compared between the 2 groups respectively. RESULTS: TDLs had a significantly higher incidence of intralesional hyperintensities on FA maps (P = .049) but a lower incidence of a perilesional hyperintense FA rim (P < .001), compared with those of high-grade gliomas on visual inspection. TDLs had significantly higher FA (P = .004) and lower MD (P = .001) values in the peripheral enhancing portions of the lesions compared with those of high-grade gliomas. In perilesional edema, FA values were significantly higher in high-grade gliomas (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: DTI is helpful in differentiating TDLs from high-grade gliomas by using visual inspection and quantitative analysis.
Authors: H S Malhotra; K K Jain; A Agarwal; M K Singh; S K Yadav; M Husain; N Krishnani; R K Gupta Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Burkhard Mädler; Sylvia A Drabycz; Shannon H Kolind; Kenneth P Whittall; Alexander L MacKay Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2008-06-04 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Matteo Paoletti; Shaun Ivan Muzic; Francesca Marchetti; Lisa Maria Farina; Stefano Bastianello; Anna Pichiecchio Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2021-01-24 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: S Wang; S J Kim; H Poptani; J H Woo; S Mohan; R Jin; M R Voluck; D M O'Rourke; R L Wolf; E R Melhem; S Kim Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-02-06 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: S B Hiremath; A Muraleedharan; S Kumar; C Nagesh; C Kesavadas; M Abraham; T R Kapilamoorthy; B Thomas Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2017-02-16 Impact factor: 3.825