INTRODUCTION: EGFR-mutant lung cancers are sensitive to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Unfortunately, they develop resistance, often due to acquisition of a second-site mutation (T790M). Current EGFR TKIs select for T790M in preclinical models of acquired resistance. We explored whether all EGFR TKIs similarly select for the T790M mutation using data from early clinical trials and established in vitro models of acquired resistance. METHODS: We analyzed the clinical characteristics of eight patients with metastatic EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma who were treated first-line with XL647 and then progressed. XL647 is an ATP-competitive inhibitor of EGFR, HER2, KDR, and EPHB4. Additional molecular preclinical studies were performed to characterize resistance. RESULTS: Four patients displayed confirmed partial responses (PRs), three patients had unconfirmed PRs, and one patient displayed stable disease. Only one of five patients' tumor samples available for analysis after disease progression harbored the T790M mutation. Eight patients subsequently received erlotinib, with (n = 3) or without (n = 5) chemotherapy. Three of five patients treated with single-agent erlotinib derived additional benefit, staying on drug up to 9 months. EGFR-mutant PC-9 cells with acquired resistance to XL647 did not harbor the T790M mutation, displayed a distinct mRNA profile from PC-9 cells with T790M-mediated resistance, and were moderately sensitive to erlotinib in growth inhibition assays. Crystal structure analyses of XL647/EGFR T790M did not reveal a different binding mode from that of erlotinib. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this exploratory study suggest that different EGFR TKIs may select for distinct mechanisms of resistance. These results raise the possibility that different EGFR TKIs could be sequentially used to improve outcomes in patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancer. Further work investigating this hypothesis is warranted.
INTRODUCTION:EGFR-mutant lung cancers are sensitive to EGFRtyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Unfortunately, they develop resistance, often due to acquisition of a second-site mutation (T790M). Current EGFR TKIs select for T790M in preclinical models of acquired resistance. We explored whether all EGFR TKIs similarly select for the T790M mutation using data from early clinical trials and established in vitro models of acquired resistance. METHODS: We analyzed the clinical characteristics of eight patients with metastatic EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma who were treated first-line with XL647 and then progressed. XL647 is an ATP-competitive inhibitor of EGFR, HER2, KDR, and EPHB4. Additional molecular preclinical studies were performed to characterize resistance. RESULTS: Four patients displayed confirmed partial responses (PRs), three patients had unconfirmed PRs, and one patient displayed stable disease. Only one of five patients' tumor samples available for analysis after disease progression harbored the T790M mutation. Eight patients subsequently received erlotinib, with (n = 3) or without (n = 5) chemotherapy. Three of five patients treated with single-agent erlotinib derived additional benefit, staying on drug up to 9 months. EGFR-mutant PC-9 cells with acquired resistance to XL647 did not harbor the T790M mutation, displayed a distinct mRNA profile from PC-9 cells with T790M-mediated resistance, and were moderately sensitive to erlotinib in growth inhibition assays. Crystal structure analyses of XL647/EGFRT790M did not reveal a different binding mode from that of erlotinib. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this exploratory study suggest that different EGFR TKIs may select for distinct mechanisms of resistance. These results raise the possibility that different EGFR TKIs could be sequentially used to improve outcomes in patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancer. Further work investigating this hypothesis is warranted.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Lecia V Sequist; Benjamin Besse; Thomas J Lynch; Vincent A Miller; Kwok K Wong; Barbara Gitlitz; Keith Eaton; Charles Zacharchuk; Amy Freyman; Christine Powell; Revathi Ananthakrishnan; Susan Quinn; Jean-Charles Soria Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-05-17 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Juliann Chmielecki; Jasmine Foo; Geoffrey R Oxnard; Katherine Hutchinson; Kadoaki Ohashi; Romel Somwar; Lu Wang; Katherine R Amato; Maria Arcila; Martin L Sos; Nicholas D Socci; Agnes Viale; Elisa de Stanchina; Michelle S Ginsberg; Roman K Thomas; Mark G Kris; Akira Inoue; Marc Ladanyi; Vincent A Miller; Franziska Michor; William Pao Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2011-07-06 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Geoffrey R Oxnard; Maria E Arcila; Camelia S Sima; Gregory J Riely; Juliann Chmielecki; Mark G Kris; William Pao; Marc Ladanyi; Vincent A Miller Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-12-06 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Maria E Arcila; Geoffrey R Oxnard; Khedoudja Nafa; Gregory J Riely; Stephen B Solomon; Maureen F Zakowski; Mark G Kris; William Pao; Vincent A Miller; Marc Ladanyi Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-01-19 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: James Bean; Gregory J Riely; Marissa Balak; Jenifer L Marks; Marc Ladanyi; Vincent A Miller; William Pao Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-11-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Wenjun Zhou; Dalia Ercan; Liang Chen; Cai-Hong Yun; Danan Li; Marzia Capelletti; Alexis B Cortot; Lucian Chirieac; Roxana E Iacob; Robert Padera; John R Engen; Kwok-Kin Wong; Michael J Eck; Nathanael S Gray; Pasi A Jänne Journal: Nature Date: 2009-12-24 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Todd A Carter; Lisa M Wodicka; Neil P Shah; Anne Marie Velasco; Miles A Fabian; Daniel K Treiber; Zdravko V Milanov; Corey E Atteridge; William H Biggs; Philip T Edeen; Mark Floyd; Julia M Ford; Robert M Grotzfeld; Sanna Herrgard; Darren E Insko; Shamal A Mehta; Hitesh K Patel; William Pao; Charles L Sawyers; Harold Varmus; Patrick P Zarrinkar; David J Lockhart Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-07-26 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Katherine R Amato; Shan Wang; Li Tan; Andrew K Hastings; Wenqiang Song; Christine M Lovly; Catherine B Meador; Fei Ye; Pengcheng Lu; Justin M Balko; Daniel C Colvin; Justin M Cates; William Pao; Nathanael S Gray; Jin Chen Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2016-01-07 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Meghna Das Thakur; Fernando Salangsang; Allison S Landman; William R Sellers; Nancy K Pryer; Mitchell P Levesque; Reinhard Dummer; Martin McMahon; Darrin D Stuart Journal: Nature Date: 2013-01-09 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: William F Elmquist; Jann N Sarkaria; Sani H Kizilbash; Shiv K Gupta; Karen E Parrish; Janice K Laramy; Minjee Kim; Gautham Gampa; Brett L Carlson; Katrina K Bakken; Ann C Mladek; Mark A Schroeder; Paul A Decker Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2021-03-30 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Darren A E Cross; Susan E Ashton; Serban Ghiorghiu; Cath Eberlein; Caroline A Nebhan; Paula J Spitzler; Jonathon P Orme; M Raymond V Finlay; Richard A Ward; Martine J Mellor; Gareth Hughes; Amar Rahi; Vivien N Jacobs; Monica Red Brewer; Eiki Ichihara; Jing Sun; Hailing Jin; Peter Ballard; Katherine Al-Kadhimi; Rachel Rowlinson; Teresa Klinowska; Graham H P Richmond; Mireille Cantarini; Dong-Wan Kim; Malcolm R Ranson; William Pao Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 39.397