Literature DB >> 22173676

Comparison of video-assisted mediastinoscopy and video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy for lung cancer.

Adnan Sayar1, Necati Citak, Muzaffer Metin, Akif Turna, Atilla Pekçolaklar, Abdulaziz Kök, Nur Urer, Alper Celikten, Zeynep Nilgün Ulukol, Atilla Gürses.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared the efficacy and complications of video-assisted mediastinoscopy (VAM) and video-assisted mediastinal lymphadenectomy (VAMLA) for mediastinal staging of lung cancer.
METHODS: Between March 2006 and July 2008, a total of 157 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) underwent VAM (n = 113, 72%) or VAMLA (n = 44, 28%). We studied them retrospectively. Data for the operating time, node stations sampled/dissected, number of biopsies, and the patients who were pN0 by mediastinoscopy and underwent thoracotomy were collected. The false-negative rate was calculated. Demographics and operative complications were analyzed.
RESULTS: The overall complication rate was 5.7% (n = 9). The most common complication was hoarseness (n = 8). Complications were seen significantly more often after VAMLA than after VAM (11.3% vs. 2.6%, P = 0.04). There were no deaths. The mean number of removed lymph nodes (8.43 ± 1.08) and the station numbers (4.81 ± 0.44) per patient were higher with VAMLA than with VAM (7.65 ± 1.68, P = 0.008 and 4.38 ± 0.80, P = 0.001, respectively). The mean operating time was 44.8 ± 6.6 min for VAM and 82.0 ± 7.8 min for VAMLA. Patients diagnosed as pN2 numbered 9 in the VAMLA group and 27 in the VAM group. The patients diagnosed as pN0 with mediastinoscopy then underwent thoracotomy (VAM 77, VAMLA 32). When they were investigated for the presence of mediastinal lymph nodes, there were three (3.8%) false-negative results in the VAM group and five (15.6%) in the VAMLA group. Sensitivity, accuracy, and negative predictive values for VAM and VAMLA were 0.90/0.97/0.96 and 0.64/0.87/0.84, respectively.
CONCLUSION: VAMLA was found to be superior to VAM with regard to the number of stations and lymph nodes. Complications after VAMLA were common. The sensitivity and NPV of VAM for mediastinal staging are significantly higher than those of VAMLA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22173676     DOI: 10.1007/s11748-011-0819-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 1863-6705


  14 in total

1.  Radical video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy (VAMLA)--technique and first results.

Authors:  Martin Hürtgen; Godehard Friedel; Heikki Toomes; Peter Fritz
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.191

2.  Mediastinoscopy: a method for inspection and tissue biopsy in the superior mediastinum.

Authors:  E CARLENS
Journal:  Dis Chest       Date:  1959-10

3.  Video-assisted mediastinoscopic surgery: clinical feasibility and accuracy of mediastinal lymph node staging.

Authors:  Biruta Witte; Michael Wolf; Martin Huertgen; Heikki Toomes
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Aggressive surgical intervention in N2 non-small cell cancer of the lung.

Authors:  Y Watanabe; J Shimizu; M Oda; Y Hayashi; S Watanabe; Y Tatsuzawa; T Iwa; M Suzuki; T Takashima
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Revisions in the International System for Staging Lung Cancer.

Authors:  C F Mountain
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  Complications of mediastinoscopy.

Authors:  H J Puhakka
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 1.469

7.  Video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy (VAMLA).

Authors:  Biruta Witte; Martin Hürtgen
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 15.609

8.  Palsy of the recurrent nerve following mediastinoscopy.

Authors:  A Widström
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy (VAMLA)--a method for systematic mediastinal lymphnode dissection.

Authors:  Gunda Leschber; Gabriele Holinka; Albert Linder
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.191

10.  ESTS guidelines for preoperative lymph node staging for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Paul De Leyn; Didier Lardinois; Paul E Van Schil; Ramon Rami-Porta; Bernward Passlick; Marcin Zielinski; David A Waller; Tony Lerut; Walter Weder
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 4.191

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Current status and perspective of EBUS-TBNA.

Authors:  Takahiro Nakajima; Kazuhiro Yasufuku; Ichiro Yoshino
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-02-26

Review 2.  Comparison of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration and Video-Assisted Mediastinoscopy for Mediastinal Staging of Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Xiahui Ge; Wenbin Guan; Fengfeng Han; Xuejun Guo; Zhichao Jin
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2015-07-18       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 3.  Staging lung cancer: role of endobronchial ultrasound.

Authors:  Terunaga Inage; Takahiro Nakajima; Ichiro Yoshino
Journal:  Lung Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2014-11-04

4.  Surgical mediastinal lymph node staging for non-small-cell lung carcinoma.

Authors:  Pieter W J Lozekoot; Jean H T Daemen; Robert R van den Broek; Jos G Maessen; Michiel H M Gronenschild; Yvonne L J Vissers; Karel W E Hulsewé; Erik R de Loos
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2021-08

5.  Rotation aiding technique for endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration biopsy of intrathoracic lymph nodes: A complementary approach to the conventional jabbing method.

Authors:  Seung Won Ra; Taehoon Lee; Hee Jeong Cha; Chang-Ryul Park; Jiyeon Baek; Youngjoon Chee; Woon Jung Kwon
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 3.223

Review 6.  Mediastinal lymph node staging for lung cancer.

Authors:  Noriyoshi Sawabata
Journal:  Mediastinum       Date:  2019-08-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.