Literature DB >> 22173598

Underneath the unconventional: philosophies & paradigms of special operations forces clinical science.

Kate Froede.   

Abstract

Special Operations Forces (SOF) medical personnel (clinicians) directly impact their patients' outcomes, regardless if the patient is a Soldier, civilian, or indigenous person. Any health practitioner who specializes in trauma, Soldiers' healthcare, or tactical and/or operational healthcare must have a working knowledge of SOF medicine and its philosophical, political, and contextual origins. SOF clinical evidence and knowledge base is extensive and inextricably linked to SOF clinicians' underlying warrior philosophy and worldview. This submission will argue the point that SOF healthcare is a discipline and mature science in its own right, as evidenced by SOF's utilization and/or rejection of other disciplines' (nursing, medicine, conventional military) paradigms, community-wide adoption of its own specific paradigms, disciplinary matrix, and language. Peer-reviewed articles relevant to SOF and military healthcare from 2009-2011 are reviewed to determine possible philosophical frameworks, identify extant methodologies, and demonstrate underlying philosophical constructs. 2011.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22173598     DOI: 10.55460/VVZR-PR2G

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spec Oper Med        ISSN: 1553-9768


  1 in total

1.  Thirty-day prevalence of DSM-IV mental disorders among nondeployed soldiers in the US Army: results from the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS).

Authors:  Ronald C Kessler; Steven G Heeringa; Murray B Stein; Lisa J Colpe; Carol S Fullerton; Irving Hwang; James A Naifeh; Matthew K Nock; Maria Petukhova; Nancy A Sampson; Michael Schoenbaum; Alan M Zaslavsky; Robert J Ursano
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 21.596

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.