PURPOSE: Detection of pancreatic cancer remains a high priority and effective diagnostic tools are needed for clinical applications. Many cancer cells overexpress integrin α(v)β(6), a cell surface receptor being evaluated as a novel clinical biomarker. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: To validate this molecular target, several highly stable cystine knot peptides were engineered by directed evolution to bind specifically and with high affinity (3-6 nmol/L) to integrin α(v)β(6). The binders do not cross-react with related integrin α(v)β(5), integrin α(5)β(1), or tumor-angiogenesis-associated integrin, α(v)β(3). RESULTS: Positron emission tomography showed that these disulfide-stabilized peptides rapidly accumulate at tumors expressing integrin α(v)β(6). Clinically relevant tumor-to-muscle ratios of 7.7 ± 2.4 to 11.3 ± 3.0 were achieved within 1 hour after radiotracer injection. Minimization of off-target dosing was achieved by reformatting α(v)β(6)-binding activities across various natural and pharmacokinetically stabilized cystine knot scaffolds with different amino acid content. We show that the primary sequence of a peptide scaffold directs its pharmacokinetics. Scaffolds with high arginine or glutamic acid content suffered high renal retention of more than 75% injected dose per gram (%ID/g). Substitution of these amino acids with renally cleared amino acids, notably serine, led to significant decreases in renal accumulation of less than 20%ID/g 1 hour postinjection (P < 0.05, n = 3). CONCLUSIONS: We have engineered highly stable cystine knot peptides with potent and specific integrin α(v)β(6)-binding activities for cancer detection. Pharmacokinetic engineering of scaffold primary sequence led to significant decreases in off-target radiotracer accumulation. Optimization of binding affinity, specificity, stability, and pharmacokinetics will facilitate translation of cystine knots for cancer molecular imaging.
PURPOSE: Detection of pancreatic cancer remains a high priority and effective diagnostic tools are needed for clinical applications. Many cancer cells overexpress integrin α(v)β(6), a cell surface receptor being evaluated as a novel clinical biomarker. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: To validate this molecular target, several highly stable cystine knot peptides were engineered by directed evolution to bind specifically and with high affinity (3-6 nmol/L) to integrin α(v)β(6). The binders do not cross-react with related integrin α(v)β(5), integrin α(5)β(1), or tumor-angiogenesis-associated integrin, α(v)β(3). RESULTS: Positron emission tomography showed that these disulfide-stabilized peptides rapidly accumulate at tumors expressing integrin α(v)β(6). Clinically relevant tumor-to-muscle ratios of 7.7 ± 2.4 to 11.3 ± 3.0 were achieved within 1 hour after radiotracer injection. Minimization of off-target dosing was achieved by reformatting α(v)β(6)-binding activities across various natural and pharmacokinetically stabilized cystine knot scaffolds with different amino acid content. We show that the primary sequence of a peptide scaffold directs its pharmacokinetics. Scaffolds with high arginine or glutamic acid content suffered high renal retention of more than 75% injected dose per gram (%ID/g). Substitution of these amino acids with renally cleared amino acids, notably serine, led to significant decreases in renal accumulation of less than 20%ID/g 1 hour postinjection (P < 0.05, n = 3). CONCLUSIONS: We have engineered highly stable cystine knot peptides with potent and specific integrin α(v)β(6)-binding activities for cancer detection. Pharmacokinetic engineering of scaffold primary sequence led to significant decreases in off-target radiotracer accumulation. Optimization of binding affinity, specificity, stability, and pharmacokinetics will facilitate translation of cystine knots for cancer molecular imaging.
Authors: A Heitz; J F Hernandez; J Gagnon; T T Hong; T T Pham; T M Nguyen; D Le-Nguyen; L Chiche Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2001-07-10 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: M Karen J Gagnon; Sven H Hausner; Jan Marik; Craig K Abbey; John F Marshall; Julie L Sutcliffe Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-10-07 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jürgen K Willmann; Richard H Kimura; Nirupama Deshpande; Amelie M Lutz; Jennifer R Cochran; Sanjiv S Gambhir Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2010-02-11 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: N Ahmed; F Pansino; Riley Clyde; P Murthi; M A Quinn; G E Rice; M V Agrez; S Mok; M S Baker Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Lei Jiang; Richard H Kimura; Zheng Miao; Adam P Silverman; Gang Ren; Hongguang Liu; Peiyong Li; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir; Jennifer R Cochran; Zhen Cheng Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Vladimir Tolmachev; Daniel Rosik; Helena Wållberg; Anna Sjöberg; Mattias Sandström; Monika Hansson; Anders Wennborg; Anna Orlova Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2009-10-17 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: David E Hacker; Jan Hoinka; Emil S Iqbal; Teresa M Przytycka; Matthew C T Hartman Journal: ACS Chem Biol Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 5.100
Authors: Sven H Hausner; Richard J Bold; Lina Y Cheuy; Helen K Chew; Megan E Daly; Ryan A Davis; Cameron C Foster; Edward J Kim; Julie L Sutcliffe Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-11-06 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Max A Kruziki; Brett A Case; Jie Y Chan; Elizabeth J Zudock; Daniel R Woldring; Douglas Yee; Benjamin J Hackel Journal: Mol Pharm Date: 2016-10-10 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Benjamin J Hackel; Richard H Kimura; Zheng Miao; Hongguang Liu; Ataya Sathirachinda; Zhen Cheng; Frederick T Chin; Sanjiv S Gambhir Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2013-05-13 Impact factor: 10.057