Literature DB >> 22173522

Temporary central venous catheter utilization patterns in a large tertiary care center: tracking the "idle central venous catheter".

Sheri Chernetsky Tejedor1, David Tong, Jason Stein, Christina Payne, Daniel Dressler, Wenqiong Xue, James P Steinberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Although central venous catheter (CVC) dwell time is a major risk factor for catheter-related bloodstream infections (CR-BSIs), few studies reveal how often CVCs are retained when not needed ("idle"). We describe use patterns for temporary CVCs, including peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs), on non-ICU wards.
DESIGN: A retrospective observational study.
SETTING: A 579-bed acute care, academic tertiary care facility.
METHODS: A retrospective observational study of a random sample of patients on hospital wards who have a temporary, nonimplanted CVC, with a focus on on daily ward CVC justification. A uniform definition of idle CVC-days was used.
RESULTS: We analyzed 89 patients with 146 CVCs (56% of which were PICCs); of 1,433 ward CVC-days, 361 (25.2%) were idle. At least 1 idle day was observed for 63% of patients. Patients had a mean of 4.1 idle days and a mean of 3.4 days with both a CVC and a peripheral intravenous catheter (PIV). After adjusting for ward length of stay, mean CVC dwell time was 14.4 days for patients with PICCs versus 9.0 days for patients with non-PICC temporary CVCs (other CVCs; P<.001). Patients with a PICC had 5.4 days in which they also had a PIV, compared with 10 days in other CVC patients (P<.001). Patients with PICCs had more days in which the only justification for the CVC was intravenous administration of antimicrobial agents (8.5 vs 1.6 days; P=.0013).
CONCLUSIONS: Significant proportions of ward CVC-days were unjustified. Reducing "idle CVC-days" and facilitating the appropriate use of PIVs may reduce CVC-days and CR-BSI risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22173522     DOI: 10.1086/663645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


  11 in total

1.  Persistent Barriers to Timely Catheter Removal Identified from Clinical Observations and Interviews.

Authors:  Martha Quinn; Jessica M Ameling; Jane Forman; Sarah L Krein; Milisa Manojlovich; Karen E Fowler; Elizabeth A King; Jennifer Meddings
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2019-12-23

2.  Diagnostic usefulness of differential time to positivity for catheter-related candidemia.

Authors:  Ki-Ho Park; Mi Suk Lee; Sang-Oh Lee; Sang-Ho Choi; Heungsup Sung; Mi-Na Kim; Yang Soo Kim; Jun Hee Woo; Sung-Han Kim
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Do clinicians know which of their patients have central venous catheters?: a multicenter observational study.

Authors:  Vineet Chopra; Sushant Govindan; Latoya Kuhn; David Ratz; Randy F Sweis; Natalie Melin; Rachel Thompson; Aaron Tolan; James Barron; Sanjay Saint
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 4.  The effect of the multimodal intervention including an automatic notification of catheter days on reducing central line-related bloodstream infection: a retrospective, observational, quasi-experimental study.

Authors:  Sohyun Bae; Yoonjung Kim; Hyun-Ha Chang; Sungjin Kim; Hyun-Ji Kim; Hyeyoung Jeon; Juhee Cho; Juyoung Lee; Hwajin Chae; Gyeongmin Han; Shin-Woo Kim
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.667

5.  'Matching Michigan': a 2-year stepped interventional programme to minimise central venous catheter-blood stream infections in intensive care units in England.

Authors:  Julian Bion; Annette Richardson; Peter Hibbert; Jeanette Beer; Tracy Abrusci; Martin McCutcheon; Jane Cassidy; Jane Eddleston; Kevin Gunning; Geoff Bellingan; Mark Patten; David Harrison
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 7.035

Review 6.  Reducing Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSIs) by Reducing Central Line Days.

Authors:  Amber Shaye McElveen Beville; Diane Heipel; Ginger Vanhoozer; Pamela Bailey
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 3.725

7.  Epidemiology and impact of a multifaceted approach in controlling central venous catheter associated blood stream infections outside the intensive care unit.

Authors:  José Francisco García-Rodríguez; Hortensia Álvarez-Díaz; Laura Vilariño-Maneiro; María Virginia Lorenzo-García; Ana Cantón-Blanco; Patricia Ordoñez-Barrosa; Ana Isabel Mariño-Callejo; Pascual Sesma-Sánchez
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.090

8.  Investigation of biofilm formation on a charged intravenous catheter relative to that on a similar but uncharged catheter.

Authors:  Guy A Richards; Adrian J Brink; Ross McIntosh; Helen C Steel; Riana Cockeran
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2014-06-20

9.  Risk associated with central catheters for malignant tumor patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yajuan Lv; Yong Hou; Bo Pan; Yuwan Ma; Paiyun Li; Lili Yu; Deguo Xu; Juanjuan Song; Heli Shang; Hongyan Wang; Yuan Tian
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-01-12

10.  Safety Checklist Implementation Did Not Reduce Central Venous Catheter Duration in Pediatric Cardiac ICU Patients.

Authors:  Raj Sahulee; Michelle M Ramirez; Yasir M Al-Qaqaa; Sujata B Chakravarti; Jaclyn McKinstry
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2020-01-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.