Literature DB >> 22173121

Trends in pathology malpractice claims.

David B Troxel1.   

Abstract

Previously reported analyses of pathology malpractice claims reported to The Doctors Company from 1995 through 2003 uncovered repetitive patterns of specimen type and diagnostic category that contributed to claims. To determine whether these patterns had changed, 276 pathology malpractice claims from 2004 through 2010 were reviewed and are the subject of this report. Claims involving melanoma, breast (specimens and fine needle aspiration), system error, gynecologic cytology, and fine needle aspiration (excluding breast) accounted for 49% of the total claims. There has been a significant decline in the number of claims involving melanoma, breast, and gynecologic cytology, and the factors contributing to this decline are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22173121     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31823836bb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  3 in total

Review 1.  The ins and outs of molecular pathology reporting.

Authors:  Véronique Tack; Kelly Dufraing; Zandra C Deans; Han J van Krieken; Elisabeth M C Dequeker
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-03-26       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Local edge-enhanced active contour for accurate skin lesion border detection.

Authors:  Mustafa Bayraktar; Sinan Kockara; Tansel Halic; Mutlu Mete; Henry K Wong; Kamran Iqbal
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Malpractice Concerns, Defensive Medicine, and the Histopathology Diagnosis of Melanocytic Skin Lesions.

Authors:  Linda J Titus; Lisa M Reisch; Anna N A Tosteson; Heidi D Nelson; Paul D Frederick; Patricia A Carney; Raymond L Barnhill; David E Elder; Martin A Weinstock; Michael W Piepkorn; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 2.493

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.