BACKGROUND: The Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT) demonstrated that irbesartan significantly slowed established Type 2 diabetic nephropathy progression. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), now widely used to monitor chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression, was not previously examined in IDNT. This post hoc analysis aimed to confirm IDNT results using eGFR as principal outcome measure. METHODS: Mean change in eGFR from baseline (ΔeGFR) was analysed using linear mixed-effects models over time and analysis of covariance at end of study on an intention-to-treat basis. Potential treatment response moderators and/or mediators assessed were CKD stage, blood pressure (BP) and proteinuria. RESULTS: Irbesartan significantly slowed the rate of ΔeGFR decline from 6 to 21 months (P = 0.0048) and 24 to 48 months (P < 0.0001) versus amlodipine and placebo, despite a faster decline in the first month. The longer patients remained on irbesartan the greater the benefit (model-derived estimates for 6-21 and 24-48 month periods were -0.3354 and -0.1947 mL/min/1.73 m(2)/month, respectively). Irbesartan slowed the rate of ΔeGFR decline irrespective of baseline CKD stage, BP or proteinuria level. Irbesartan produced rapid and sustained proteinuria reductions, which only partially mediated treatment response. Irbesartan increased serum potassium, but levels stabilized from 6 to 48 months. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with established Type 2 diabetic nephropathy and CKD Stages 1-5, irbesartan safely and significantly slowed the rate of ΔeGFR decline (-2.34 mL/min/1.73 m(2)/year) compared to amlodipine (-3.76 mL/min/1.73 m(2)/year) and placebo (-3.52 mL/min/1.73 m(2)/year). This rate of decline was slower with longer duration of irbesartan treatment and only partly explained by observed reductions in BP and proteinuria.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The IrbesartanDiabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT) demonstrated that irbesartan significantly slowed established Type 2 diabetic nephropathy progression. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), now widely used to monitor chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression, was not previously examined in IDNT. This post hoc analysis aimed to confirm IDNT results using eGFR as principal outcome measure. METHODS: Mean change in eGFR from baseline (ΔeGFR) was analysed using linear mixed-effects models over time and analysis of covariance at end of study on an intention-to-treat basis. Potential treatment response moderators and/or mediators assessed were CKD stage, blood pressure (BP) and proteinuria. RESULTS:Irbesartan significantly slowed the rate of ΔeGFR decline from 6 to 21 months (P = 0.0048) and 24 to 48 months (P < 0.0001) versus amlodipine and placebo, despite a faster decline in the first month. The longer patients remained on irbesartan the greater the benefit (model-derived estimates for 6-21 and 24-48 month periods were -0.3354 and -0.1947 mL/min/1.73 m(2)/month, respectively). Irbesartan slowed the rate of ΔeGFR decline irrespective of baseline CKD stage, BP or proteinuria level. Irbesartan produced rapid and sustained proteinuria reductions, which only partially mediated treatment response. Irbesartan increased serum potassium, but levels stabilized from 6 to 48 months. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with established Type 2 diabetic nephropathy and CKD Stages 1-5, irbesartan safely and significantly slowed the rate of ΔeGFR decline (-2.34 mL/min/1.73 m(2)/year) compared to amlodipine (-3.76 mL/min/1.73 m(2)/year) and placebo (-3.52 mL/min/1.73 m(2)/year). This rate of decline was slower with longer duration of irbesartan treatment and only partly explained by observed reductions in BP and proteinuria.
Authors: John T Liles; Britton K Corkey; Gregory T Notte; Grant R Budas; Eric B Lansdon; Ford Hinojosa-Kirschenbaum; Shawn S Badal; Michael Lee; Brian E Schultz; Sarah Wise; Swetha Pendem; Michael Graupe; Laurie Castonguay; Keith A Koch; Melanie H Wong; Giuseppe A Papalia; Dorothy M French; Theodore Sullivan; Erik G Huntzicker; Frank Y Ma; David J Nikolic-Paterson; Tareq Altuhaifi; Haichun Yang; Agnes B Fogo; David G Breckenridge Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2018-07-19 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Gudeta D Fufaa; E Jennifer Weil; Kevin V Lemley; William C Knowler; Frank C Brosius; Berne Yee; Michael Mauer; Robert G Nelson Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2016-01-20 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Glenn M Chertow; Pablo E Pergola; Fang Chen; Brian J Kirby; John S Sundy; Uptal D Patel Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2019-09-10 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Anand Ramalingam; Thulasiprevinnah Santhanathas; Shafreena Shaukat Ali; Satirah Zainalabidin Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-11-12 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Katherine R Tuttle; George L Bakris; Rudolf W Bilous; Jane L Chiang; Ian H de Boer; Jordi Goldstein-Fuchs; Irl B Hirsch; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Andrew S Narva; Sankar D Navaneethan; Joshua J Neumiller; Uptal D Patel; Robert E Ratner; Adam T Whaley-Connell; Mark E Molitch Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Kathryn S Taylor; Julie Mclellan; Jan Y Verbakel; Jeffrey K Aronson; Daniel S Lasserson; Nicola Pidduck; Nia Roberts; Susannah Fleming; Christopher A O'Callaghan; Clare R Bankhead; Amitava Banerjee; Fd Richard Hobbs; Rafael Perera Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-09-20 Impact factor: 2.692