Literature DB >> 22172216

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma: significance of microscopically positive circumferential radial margins.

John A Harvin1, Guy Lahat, Arlene M Correa, Jared Lee, Dipen Maru, Jaffer Ajani, Edith M Marom, James Welsh, Manoop S Bhutani, Garret Walsh, Jack Roth, Reza Mehran, Ara Vaporciyan, David Rice, Stephen Swisher, Wayne Hofstetter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The incidence and consequence of an isolated involved circumferential radial margin (CRM) after resection for esophageal adenocarcinoma in the setting of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has not been reported. We aimed to determine the frequency and significance of a close (<1 mm) or involved CRM in patients undergoing esophagectomy after CRT.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data from patients undergoing resection from 1997 to 2008 for esophageal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant CRT. A positive CRM was defined as microscopic tumor at or less than 1 mm of the radial margin. An R1 resection was tumor at the radial margin. Only patients with ypT3 or greater tumors were included. R2 resections were excluded. Statistical comparisons were performed using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses.
RESULTS: A total of 160 patients met the inclusion criteria, 42 (26%) had a positive CRM. The median survival did not significantly differ between the CRM-negative and -positive groups (28 vs 50 months, P = .84). A propensity score matching analysis also failed to find a significant difference in outcomes. When analyzed by tumor present at the margin (R1), R0 patients had a longer median survival compared with R1 patients (28 vs 8 months, P = .01). This difference, however, was not seen on propensity score matching.
CONCLUSIONS: Resections of locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma with residual transmural viable tumor after CRT frequently showed involvement of the radial margin with tumor either close to or at the margin. Tumor close (<1 mm) to the radial margin did not result in a significant decrease in overall or disease-free survival or increase in local recurrence.
Copyright © 2012 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22172216     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.10.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  9 in total

Review 1.  [R1 resection of esophageal carcinoma].

Authors:  I Gockel; C Wittekind
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Positive esophageal proximal resection margin: an important prognostic factor for esophageal cancer that warrants adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Yun-Cang Wang; Han-Yu Deng; Wen-Ping Wang; Du He; Peng-Zhi Ni; Wei-Peng Hu; Zhi-Qiang Wang; Long-Qi Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Surgical treatments for esophageal cancers.

Authors:  William H Allum; Luigi Bonavina; Stephen D Cassivi; Miguel A Cuesta; Zhao Ming Dong; Valter Nilton Felix; Edgar Figueredo; Piers A C Gatenby; Leonie Haverkamp; Maksat A Ibraev; Mark J Krasna; René Lambert; Rupert Langer; Michael P N Lewis; Katie S Nason; Kevin Parry; Shaun R Preston; Jelle P Ruurda; Lara W Schaheen; Roger P Tatum; Igor N Turkin; Sylvia van der Horst; Donald L van der Peet; Peter C van der Sluis; Richard van Hillegersberg; Justin C R Wormald; Peter C Wu; Barbara M Zonderhuis
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 4.  Positive circumferential resection margin in locally advanced esophageal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jie Wu; Yuqian Hu; Liwei Xu
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-02-25

5.  Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer and the predictive role of endoluminal ultrasonography.

Authors:  T D Reid; D S Y Chan; S A Roberts; T D L Crosby; G T Williams; W G Lewis
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Prognostic Value of the Circumferential Resection Margin in Esophageal Cancer Patients After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  J B Hulshoff; Z Faiz; A Karrenbeld; G Kats-Ugurlu; J G M Burgerhof; J K Smit; J Th M Plukker
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Meta-analysis of the influence of a positive circumferential resection margin in oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  R Evans; J R Bundred; P Kaur; J Hodson; E A Griffiths
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2019-06-25

8.  Impact of incremental circumferential resection margin distance on overall survival and recurrence in oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  W R C Knight; J Zylstra; W Wulaningsih; M Van Hemelrijck; D Landau; N Maisey; A Gaya; C R Baker; J A Gossage; J Largergren; A R Davies
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2018-04-23

9.  Prediction of a positive circumferential resection margin at surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus.

Authors:  W R C Knight; C Yip; W Wulaningsih; A Jacques; N Griffin; J Zylstra; M Van Hemelrijck; N Maisey; A Gaya; C R Baker; M Kelly; J A Gossage; J Lagergren; D Landau; V Goh; A R Davies; S Ngan; A Qureshi; H Deere; M Green; F Chang; U Mahadeva; B Gill-Barman; S George; J Dunn; S Zeki; J Meenan; O Hynes; G Tham; C Iezzi
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2019-08-22
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.