Ning Li1, Chang-Jie Cai, Yong-Rong Wu, Min-Qiang Lu. 1. Liver Transplantation Center, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Transplantation Research Institute of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In addition to suprahepatic vena cava anastomosis in two-cuff rat liver transplantation, recipient portal vein revascularization is one of the most difficult procedures that must be performed, especially for beginners. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 43 cases of liver transplantation were performed. Rats in Group 1 and Group 2 were subjected to transplant procedures that used the conventional and portal venoplasty techniques, respectively. The portal vein anastomosis duration, anhepatic phase length, portal vein surgical complications, and 1 wk post-transplant survival rates were recorded for each group. RESULTS: The portal revascularization duration was statistically significantly less for Group 2 versus Group 1 (1.50 ± 0.61 min and 4.32 ± 0.67 min, respectively, P < 0.05). The anhepatic phase length of Groups 1 and 2 were 21.79 ± 1.27 min and 18.55 ± 1.47 min, respectively (P < 0.05). No significant differences between the groups were observed in relation to either portal vein surgery complications or 1-week survival rates. CONCLUSIONS: The recipient portal venoplasty and cuff insertion technique is a safe and fast alternative surgical option for portal revascularization in two-cuff rat liver transplantations performed by a single trainee.
BACKGROUND: In addition to suprahepatic vena cava anastomosis in two-cuff rat liver transplantation, recipient portal vein revascularization is one of the most difficult procedures that must be performed, especially for beginners. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 43 cases of liver transplantation were performed. Rats in Group 1 and Group 2 were subjected to transplant procedures that used the conventional and portal venoplasty techniques, respectively. The portal vein anastomosis duration, anhepatic phase length, portal vein surgical complications, and 1 wk post-transplant survival rates were recorded for each group. RESULTS: The portal revascularization duration was statistically significantly less for Group 2 versus Group 1 (1.50 ± 0.61 min and 4.32 ± 0.67 min, respectively, P < 0.05). The anhepatic phase length of Groups 1 and 2 were 21.79 ± 1.27 min and 18.55 ± 1.47 min, respectively (P < 0.05). No significant differences between the groups were observed in relation to either portal vein surgery complications or 1-week survival rates. CONCLUSIONS: The recipient portal venoplasty and cuff insertion technique is a safe and fast alternative surgical option for portal revascularization in two-cuff rat liver transplantations performed by a single trainee.
Authors: Z Li; J Chen; L Li; J H Ran; J Liu; T X Gao; B Y Guo; X H Li; Z H Liu; G J Liu; Y C Gao; X L Zhang Journal: Braz J Med Biol Res Date: 2013-07-30 Impact factor: 2.590