Literature DB >> 22171935

Economic evaluation of a 100% whey-based partially hydrolyzed infant formula in the prevention of atopic dermatitis among Swiss children.

Michael Iskedjian1, Dominique Belli, Bechara Farah, Vincent Navarro, Patrick Detzel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A pharmacoeconomic analysis was undertaken to determine costs, consequences, and cost-effectiveness of a partially hydrolyzed 100% whey-based infant formula, NAN-HA®, manufactured by Nestlé S.A, Switzerland (PHF-W), branded under BEBA HA® in Switzerland, in the prevention of atopic dermatitis (AD) in 'at risk' Swiss children when compared to standard cow's milk formula (SF).
METHODS: Based on a 12-month time horizon including 6 months of formula consumption, an economic model was developed synthesizing treatment pathways, resource utilization, and costs associated with the treatment of AD in healthy 'at risk' Swiss newborns who could not be exclusively breastfed. Model inputs were retrieved from the literature, official formularies, and expert opinion. The treatment pathways considered a medical treatment approach, supplemented in some instances by a change of formula. The final outcome was the expected cost per avoided case of AD, yielding an incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) for PHF-W vs SF. Outcomes were presented from three perspectives: the Swiss public healthcare system (MOH), the subject's family, and society (SOC). A secondary analysis compared PHF-W to whey-based extensively hydrolyzed formula (EHF) in prevention.
RESULTS: The model yielded 1653 avoided AD cases by selecting PHF-W over SF in a birth cohort of 22,933 'at risk' infants. The base case analyses generated an expected ICER of CHF 982 from the MOH perspective as well as savings of CHF 2202 and CHF 1220 from the family and SOC perspectives, respectively. PHF-W yielded CHF 11.4M savings against EHF when the latter was assumed to be used in prevention. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the model.
CONCLUSION: Under a range of assumptions, this analysis has established the dominance from the family and societal perspectives and cost-effectiveness from the MOH perspective of PHF-W vs SF in the prevention of AD among 'at risk' Swiss infants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22171935     DOI: 10.3111/13696998.2011.650521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Econ        ISSN: 1369-6998            Impact factor:   2.448


  4 in total

1.  Economic value of using partially hydrolysed infant formula for risk reduction of atopic dermatitis in high-risk, not exclusively breastfed infants in Singapore.

Authors:  Marc F Botteman; Abhijeet J Bhanegaonkar; Erica G Horodniceanu; Xiang Ji; Bee Wah Lee; Lynette P Shek; Hugo Ps Van Bever; Patrick Detzel
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 1.858

2.  Economic value of atopic dermatitis prevention via infant formula use in high-risk Malaysian infants.

Authors:  Abhijeet J Bhanegaonkar; Erica G Horodniceanu; Amir Hamzah Abdul Latiff; Sanjay Woodhull; Phaik Choo Khoo; Patrick Detzel; Xiang Ji; Marc F Botteman
Journal:  Asia Pac Allergy       Date:  2015-04-29

Review 3.  Understanding economic evidence for the prevention and treatment of atopic eczema.

Authors:  T H Sach; E McManus; N J Levell
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 9.302

4.  The Use of Decision-Analytic Models in Atopic Eczema: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal.

Authors:  Emma McManus; Tracey Sach; Nick Levell
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.981

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.