BACKGROUND:Recombinant human C1-inhibitor (rhC1INH; Ruconest®) has been developed for treatment of acute angioedema attacks in patients with hereditary angioedema (HAE) due to heterozygous deficiency of C1INH. Previous reports suggest that administration of plasma-derived C1INH products may be associated with an increased risk for thromboembolic complications. OBJECTIVES: Our aim is to evaluate the effects of rhC1INH on coagulation and fibrinolysis in symptomatic HAE patients. METHODS:Levels of various coagulation and fibrinolytic parameters were determined in pre- and post-exposure plasma samples from HAE patients included in a randomized clinical trial. Patients were treated with either saline, or 50 or 100 U/kg rhC1INH for an acute angioedema attack. RESULTS: Prior to rhC1INH treatment, the majority of patients had low to normal activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTT) and increased levels of prothrombin fragment 1+2, thrombin-antithrombin complexes, D-dimers and plasmin-antiplasmin complexes, all of which indicate activation of both coagulation and fibrinolysis. Infusion of rhC1INH at doses up to 100 U/kg did not affect these parameters except for a dose-dependent prolongation of aPTT, confirming that rhC1INH is an inhibitor of the contact system, and that F1+2 levels decreased. CONCLUSION: Coagulation and fibrinolytic systems are activated in HAE patients suffering from an acute angioedema attack. Treatment with rhC1INH at 50 or 100 U/kg had no effect on parameters reflecting activation of these systems except for a significant effect on aPTT, which likely reflects a pharmacodynamic effect of rhC1INH, and a reduction on plasma levels of the prothrombin activation fragment F1+2. We conclude that these results argue against a prothrombotic effect of treatment with this rhC1INH product in HAE patients.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Recombinant human C1-inhibitor (rhC1INH; Ruconest®) has been developed for treatment of acute angioedema attacks in patients with hereditary angioedema (HAE) due to heterozygous deficiency of C1INH. Previous reports suggest that administration of plasma-derived C1INH products may be associated with an increased risk for thromboembolic complications. OBJECTIVES: Our aim is to evaluate the effects of rhC1INH on coagulation and fibrinolysis in symptomatic HAEpatients. METHODS: Levels of various coagulation and fibrinolytic parameters were determined in pre- and post-exposure plasma samples from HAEpatients included in a randomized clinical trial. Patients were treated with either saline, or 50 or 100 U/kg rhC1INH for an acute angioedema attack. RESULTS: Prior to rhC1INH treatment, the majority of patients had low to normal activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTT) and increased levels of prothrombin fragment 1+2, thrombin-antithrombin complexes, D-dimers and plasmin-antiplasmin complexes, all of which indicate activation of both coagulation and fibrinolysis. Infusion of rhC1INH at doses up to 100 U/kg did not affect these parameters except for a dose-dependent prolongation of aPTT, confirming that rhC1INH is an inhibitor of the contact system, and that F1+2 levels decreased. CONCLUSION: Coagulation and fibrinolytic systems are activated in HAEpatients suffering from an acute angioedema attack. Treatment with rhC1INH at 50 or 100 U/kg had no effect on parameters reflecting activation of these systems except for a significant effect on aPTT, which likely reflects a pharmacodynamic effect of rhC1INH, and a reduction on plasma levels of the prothrombin activation fragment F1+2. We conclude that these results argue against a prothrombotic effect of treatment with this rhC1INH product in HAEpatients.