Pier Alberto Testoni1, Cristian Vailati, Sabrina Testoni, Maura Corsetti. 1. Division of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy. testoni.pieralberto@hsr.it
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) with the EsophyX(™) device is reported to be effective for creating a continent gastroesophageal valve and for good functional results, as measured by pH impedance in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of this study is to assess the long-term effect of TIF in patients with symptomatic GERD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: TIF 2.0 fundoplication was done in 42 consecutive patients. All were studied with GERD-HRQL and GERD-QUAL questionnaires, upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and 24 h pH impedance before and at 6, 12, and 24 months after TIF. RESULTS: In all, 35 patients completed 6-month follow-up; 21 (60.0%) completely stopped proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, 6 (17.1%) more than halved it, and 8 (22.9%) continued with the same dose as before the procedure. There were 26 patients with complete 24-month follow-up; 11 (42.3%) completely stopped PPI therapy, 7 (26.9%) more than halved it, and 8 (30.8%) were taking the same dose as before the procedure. Hiatal hernia and ineffective esophageal motility seemed to raise the risk of recurrence of symptoms (p = 0.02 and p < 0.001, respectively). The number of fasteners deployed during TIF was the only factor predictive of successful outcome (p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: TIF using the EsophyX device allowed withdrawal or reduction of PPI in about 77% of patients at 6-month follow-up and about 69% at 24 months. Larger number of fasteners deployed during TIF was predictive of positive outcome; pre-TIF ineffective esophageal motility and hiatal hernia raised the risk of recurrence of GERD symptoms, but were not significant from a prospective point of view.
INTRODUCTION: Transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) with the EsophyX(™) device is reported to be effective for creating a continent gastroesophageal valve and for good functional results, as measured by pH impedance in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of this study is to assess the long-term effect of TIF in patients with symptomatic GERD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: TIF 2.0 fundoplication was done in 42 consecutive patients. All were studied with GERD-HRQL and GERD-QUAL questionnaires, upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and 24 h pH impedance before and at 6, 12, and 24 months after TIF. RESULTS: In all, 35 patients completed 6-month follow-up; 21 (60.0%) completely stopped proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, 6 (17.1%) more than halved it, and 8 (22.9%) continued with the same dose as before the procedure. There were 26 patients with complete 24-month follow-up; 11 (42.3%) completely stopped PPI therapy, 7 (26.9%) more than halved it, and 8 (30.8%) were taking the same dose as before the procedure. Hiatal hernia and ineffective esophageal motility seemed to raise the risk of recurrence of symptoms (p = 0.02 and p < 0.001, respectively). The number of fasteners deployed during TIF was the only factor predictive of successful outcome (p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: TIF using the EsophyX device allowed withdrawal or reduction of PPI in about 77% of patients at 6-month follow-up and about 69% at 24 months. Larger number of fasteners deployed during TIF was predictive of positive outcome; pre-TIF ineffective esophageal motility and hiatal hernia raised the risk of recurrence of GERD symptoms, but were not significant from a prospective point of view.
Authors: Toshitaka Hoppo; Arul Immanuel; Matthew Schuchert; Zdenek Dubrava; Andrew Smith; Peter Nottle; David I Watson; Blair A Jobe Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2010-09-28 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: G B Cadière; A Rajan; M Rqibate; O Germay; G Dapri; J Himpens; A K Gawlicka Journal: Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol Date: 2006 Impact factor: 2.442
Authors: J M Raymond; P Marquis; D Bechade; D Smith; H Mathiex Fortunet; T Poynard; J P Galmiche; M Amouretti Journal: Gastroenterol Clin Biol Date: 1999-01
Authors: L Lundell; P Miettinen; H E Myrvold; S A Pedersen; B Liedman; J G Hatlebakk; R Julkonen; K Levander; J Carlsson; M Lamm; I Wiklund Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Guy-Bernard Cadière; Nathalie Van Sante; Jaime E Graves; Anna K Gawlicka; Amin Rajan Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2009-03-14 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Blair A Jobe; Robert W O'Rourke; Barry P McMahon; Flemming Gravesen; Cedric Lorenzo; John G Hunter; Mary Bronner; Stefan J M Kraemer Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Bart P L Witteman; Jose M Conchillo; Nicolaas F Rinsma; Bark Betzel; Andrea Peeters; Ger H Koek; Laurents P S Stassen; Nicole D Bouvy Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-03-31 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Nicolaas F Rinsma; Fabiënne G Smeets; Daisy W Bruls; Boudewijn F Kessing; Nicole D Bouvy; Ad A M Masclee; José M Conchillo Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2013-10-23 Impact factor: 4.584