Literature DB >> 22170251

Laparoscopic extralevator abdominal perineal excision of the rectum: the best of both worlds.

B Singh1, G Lloyd, P J Nilsson, S Chaudhri.   

Abstract

We report a combined laparoscopic and open technique for extralevator abdominal perineal excision of the rectum. The key steps are a laparoscopic rectal dissection limited distally by the coccyx. The open, prone, perineal dissection affords excellent views and allows a cylindrical specimen to be obtained. The resulting perineal defect is closed by a biological mesh. Extralevator abdominal perineal excision of the rectum offers a superior oncological specimen with reduced circumferential resection margin involvement compared to traditional techniques. Combined with a laparoscopic approach, this also has the potential to improve postoperative recovery and reduce morbidity.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22170251     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-011-0797-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  5 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: long-term oncologic results.

Authors:  Christophe Laurent; Fabien Leblanc; Philippe Wütrich; Mathieu Scheffler; Eric Rullier
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Extended abdominoperineal resection with gluteus maximus flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor for rectal cancer.

Authors:  T Holm; A Ljung; T Häggmark; G Jurell; J Lagergren
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  The modern abdominoperineal excision: the next challenge after total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  Roger Marr; Kevin Birbeck; James Garvican; Christopher P Macklin; Nicholas J Tiffin; Wendy J Parsons; Michael F Dixon; Nicholas P Mapstone; David Sebag-Montefiore; Nigel Scott; David Johnston; Peter Sagar; Paul Finan; Philip Quirke
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Evidence of the oncologic superiority of cylindrical abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas P West; Paul J Finan; Claes Anderin; Johan Lindholm; Torbjorn Holm; Philip Quirke
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-06-09       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  The abdominoperineal resection itself is associated with an adverse outcome: the European experience based on a pooled analysis of five European randomised clinical trials on rectal cancer.

Authors:  Marcel den Dulk; Hein Putter; Laurence Collette; Corrie A M Marijnen; Joakim Folkesson; Jean-Francois Bosset; Claus Rödel; Krzysztof Bujko; Lars Påhlman; Cornelis J H van de Velde
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 9.162

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Single port-assisted fully laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection (APR) with immediate V-RAM flap reconstruction of the perineal defect.

Authors:  Sayid Ali; Mohamed Moftah; Nadeem Ajmal; Ronan A Cahill
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2012-05-29

Review 2.  Biological mesh reconstruction of the pelvic floor following abdominoperineal excision for cancer: A review.

Authors:  Boris Schiltz; Nicolas Christian Buchs; Marta Penna; Cosimo Riccardo Scarpa; Emilie Liot; Philippe Morel; Frederic Ris
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-06-10

3.  Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing biological mesh closure of the pelvic floor with primary perineal wound closure after extralevator abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer (BIOPEX-study).

Authors:  Gijsbert D Musters; Willem A Bemelman; Robbert J I Bosker; Jacobus W A Burger; Peter van Duijvendijk; Boudewijn van Etten; Anna A W van Geloven; Eelco J R de Graaf; Christiaan Hoff; Niels de Korte; Jeroen W A Leijtens; Harm J T Rutten; Baljit Singh; Anthony van de Ven; Ronald J C L M Vuylsteke; Johannes H W de Wilt; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Pieter J Tanis
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 2.102

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.