Literature DB >> 22169984

Does expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh really shrink after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair?

P R Carter1, K A LeBlanc, M G Hausmann, J M Whitaker, V K Rhynes, K P Kleinpeter, B W Allain.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The shrinkage of mesh has been cited as a possible explanation for hernia recurrence. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) is unique in that it can be visualized on computed tomography (CT). Some animal studies have shown a greater than 40% rate of contraction of ePTFE; however, very few human studies have been performed. STUDY
DESIGN: A total of 815 laparoscopic incisional/ventral hernia (LIVH) repairs were performed by a single surgical group. DualMesh Plus (ePTFE) (WL Gore & Associates, Newark, DE) was placed in the majority of these patients using both transfascial sutures and tack fixation. Fifty-eight patients had postoperative CTs of the abdomen and pelvis with ePTFE and known transverse diameter of the implanted mesh. The prosthesis was measured on the CT using the AquariusNet software program (TeraRecon, San Mateo, CA), which outlines the mesh and calculates the total length. Data were collected regarding the original mesh size, known linear dimension of mesh, seroma formation, and time interval since mesh implantation in months.
RESULTS: The mean shrinkage rate was 6.7%. The duration of implantation ranged from 6 weeks to 78 months, with a median of 15 months. Seroma was seen in 8.6% (5) of patients. No relationship was identified between the percentage of shrinkage and the original mesh size (P = 0.78), duration of time implanted (P = 0.57), or seroma formation (P = 0.074). In 27.5% (16) of patients, no shrinkage of mesh was identified. Of the patients who did experience mesh shrinkage, the range of shrinkage was 2.6-25%.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results are markedly different from animal studies and show that ePTFE has minimal shrinkage after LIVH repair. The use of transfascial sutures in addition to tack fixation may have an implication on the mesh contraction rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22169984     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-011-0898-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  19 in total

Review 1.  Which mesh for hernia repair?

Authors:  C N Brown; J G Finch
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  A lightweight polypropylene mesh (TiMesh) for laparoscopic intraperitoneal repair of abdominal wall hernias: comparison of biocompatibility with the DualMesh in an experimental study using the porcine model.

Authors:  C Schug-Pass; C Tamme; A Tannapfel; F Köckerling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The need for standardised animal models and scoring systems in assessing mesh biocompatibility.

Authors:  M Schreinemacher; D Henatsch; K van Barneveld; N Bouvy
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Laparoscopic repair of incisional abdominal hernias using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene: preliminary findings.

Authors:  K A LeBlanc; W V Booth
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1993-02

5.  Mesh shrinkage and pain in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial comparing suture versus tack mesh fixation.

Authors:  Guido Beldi; Markus Wagner; Lukas E Bruegger; Anita Kurmann; Daniel Candinas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Evaluation of new prosthetic meshes for ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  J W A Burger; J A Halm; A R Wijsmuller; S ten Raa; J Jeekel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Computed tomographic measurements of mesh shrinkage after laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh.

Authors:  Ernst J P Schoenmaeckers; Steef B A van der Valk; Huib W van den Hout; Johan F T J Raymakers; Srdjan Rakic
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  [The problem of mesh shrinkage in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair].

Authors:  J Jonas
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 0.942

9.  Comparison of the accuracy of CT volume calculated by circumscription to prolate ellipsoid volume (bidimensional measurement multiplied by coronal long axis).

Authors:  Ali M Rkein; Chivonne Harrigal; Arnold C Friedman; Daniel Persky; Elizabeth Krupinski
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  A new method to insert the DualMesh prosthesis for laparoscopic ventral herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  Karl A LeBlanc
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2002 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  12 in total

1.  Postoperative complications as an independent risk factor for recurrence after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a prospective study of 417 patients with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Henry Mercoli; Stylianos Tzedakis; Antonio D'Urso; Marius Nedelcu; Riccardo Memeo; Nicolas Meyer; Michel Vix; Silvana Perretta; Didier Mutter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Persistent posterior seroma after laparoscopic repair of ventral abdominal wall hernias with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh: prevalence, independent predictors and detached tacks : Retrospective review.

Authors:  V M A Stirler; R J de Haas; J T F J Raymakers; S Rakic
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Randomized clinical trial of mesh fixation with "double crown" versus "sutures and tackers" in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  F Muysoms; G Vander Mijnsbrugge; P Pletinckx; E Boldo; I Jacobs; M Michiels; R Ceulemans
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair: updated Consensus Development Conference based guidelines [corrected].

Authors:  Gianfranco Silecchia; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Luis Sanchez; Graziano Ceccarelli; Armando Antinori; Luca Ansaloni; Stefano Olmi; Giovanni Carlo Ferrari; Diego Cuccurullo; Paolo Baccari; Ferdinando Agresta; Nereo Vettoretto; Micaela Piccoli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Intraperitoneal mesh devices for small midline hernias: mesh behavior in a porcine model.

Authors:  E Reynvoet; K Chiers; I Van Overbeke; R Troisi; F Berrevoet
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Long term recurrence, pain and patient satisfaction after ventral hernia mesh repair.

Authors:  Odd Langbach; Ida Bukholm; Jūratė Šaltytė Benth; Ola Røkke
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-12-27

Review 7.  Current state of laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Francis J DeAsis; Brittany Lapin; Matthew E Gitelis; Michael B Ujiki
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  The laparoscopic modified Sugarbaker technique is safe and has a low recurrence rate: a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  B M E Hansson; S Morales-Conde; T Mussack; J Valdes; F E Muysoms; R P Bleichrodt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Prospective cohort study on mesh shrinkage measured with MRI after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with an intraperitoneal iron oxide-loaded PVDF mesh.

Authors:  Filip Muysoms; Roel Beckers; Iris Kyle-Leinhase
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Parastomal Hernia Repair with Intraperitoneal Mesh.

Authors:  Pia Näsvall; Jörgen Rutegård; Michael Dahlberg; Ulf Gunnarsson; Karin Strigård
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2017-10-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.