Literature DB >> 2216994

Efficacy of enalapril in essential hypertension and its comparison with atenolol.

M el Mangoush1, N K Singh, S Kumar, A Basha, B S Gupta, Y K Bolya, A Gamati.   

Abstract

The effect of enalapril was evaluated in 67 patients with essential hypertension, and its therapeutic efficacy was compared with atenolol in a placebo run-in, single-blind, cross-over trial. Enalapril significantly reduced blood pressure in all grades of essential hypertension. As monotherapy it 'normalized' blood pressure in 88%, 50% and 25% of patients with mild, moderate and severe hypertension respectively. Optimal dose for most of the patients was 20 to 40 mg/day. Comparison with atenolol revealed almost parallel efficacy of the two drugs, although enalapril produced a significantly greater reduction in systolic blood pressure in patients with mild and moderate hypertension (P less than 0.01 in each group). No serious side effects were encountered with either drug. Enalapril, therefore, has a potent and slightly superior antihypertensive effect to that of atenolol, and may be used as a 'first-step' drug in the treatment of hypertensive patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2216994      PMCID: PMC2429599          DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.66.776.446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN: 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  8 in total

1.  Perspectives on systolic hypertension. The Framingham study.

Authors:  W B Kannel; T R Dawber; D L McGee
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Effective dose range of enalapril in mild to moderate essential hypertension.

Authors:  R Bergstrand; H Herlitz; S Johansson; G Berglund; A Vedin; C Wilhelmsson; H J Gomez; V J Cirillo; J A Bolognese
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Enalapril in hypertension and congestive heart failure. Overall review of efficacy and safety.

Authors:  F Moncloa; J A Sromovsky; J F Walker; R O Davies
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Comparison of oral MK 421 and propranolol in mild to moderate essential hypertension and their effects on arterial and venous vessels of the forearm.

Authors:  A C Simon; J A Levenson; J D Bouthier; A Benetos; A Achimastos; M Fouchard; B C Maarek; M E Safar
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1984-03-01       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Hemodynamic and antihypertensive effects of the new oral angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor MK-421 (enalapril).

Authors:  F M Fouad; R C Tarazi; E L Bravo; S C Textor
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1984 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 6.  Enalapril worldwide experience.

Authors:  R O Davies; J D Irvin; D K Kramsch; J F Walker; F Moncloa
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1984-08-20       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Systolic and diastolic blood pressures as predictors of coronary heart disease mortality in the Whitehall study.

Authors:  M J Lichtenstein; M J Shipley; G Rose
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-07-27

8.  Enalapril, atenolol, and hydrochlorothiazide in mild to moderate hypertension. A comparative multicentre study in general practice in Norway.

Authors:  A Helgeland; R Strømmen; C H Hagelund; S Tretli
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-04-19       Impact factor: 79.321

  8 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Atenolol. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disorders.

Authors:  A N Wadworth; D Murdoch; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Enalapril versus atenolol in the treatment of hypertensive smokers.

Authors:  M Kotamäki; V Manninen; K E Laustiola
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Impact Assessment of Pharmaceutical Care in the Management of Hypertension and Coronary Risk Factors after Discharge.

Authors:  Maurílio de Souza Cazarim; Osvaldo de Freitas; Thais Rodrigues Penaforte; Angela Achcar; Leonardo Régis Leira Pereira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.