Literature DB >> 22169762

Lateral femoral cortical breach during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical analysis.

Kyle E Hammond1, Brian D Dierckman, Vishnu C Potini, John W Xerogeanes, Sameh A Labib, William C Hutton.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was to determine whether secondary fixation is needed when lateral femoral wall breach occurs and whether the diameter of the femoral tunnel affects the cyclical and ultimate load to failure of 3 different suspensory fixation devices.
METHODS: Sixty fresh-frozen porcine femora were dissected to isolate the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) footprint. Femoral ACL tunnels were then drilled at diameters of 7, 8, 9, and 10 mm. We conducted 5 separate cyclical and ultimate load testing trials, at each tunnel diameter, for 3 different cortical suspension devices.
RESULTS: The mean load to failure decreased as the tunnel size enlarged for all 3 devices. In 7-mm tunnels, mean failure load ranged from 1,163.7 to 1,455.0 N across the 3 devices; in 8-mm tunnels, 1,154.7 to 1,643.2 N; in 9-mm tunnels, 820.8 to 1,125.21 N; and in 10-mm tunnels, 314.7 to 917.8 N. Modes of failure also varied as the tunnel sizes enlarged. The ultimate load was not different among the 3 manufacturers (P = .08), but there was a difference in the ultimate load across the 4 tunnel diameters (P < .05), except when we compared the 7-mm tunnel with the 8-mm tunnel (P = .91).
CONCLUSIONS: With 7- and 8-mm-diameter tunnels, failure loads with each of the suspensory devices tested exceeded the documented interference screw load to failure. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our findings suggest that, for soft-tissue ACL grafts, femoral tunnels of 8 mm or less can be drilled through the lateral femoral cortex while still using a suspensory device for graft fixation. With pediatric, double-bundle, and anatomic ACL reconstructions, smaller and shorter tunnels are routinely used. Thus, breaching the lateral cortex when using suspensory fixation may increase tunnel length while still achieving stable fixation. Copyright Â
© 2012 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22169762     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.08.309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  4 in total

1.  Posterior Wall Blowout During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Suspensory Cortical Fixation With a Screw and Washer Post.

Authors:  Justin J Mitchell; Jorge Chahla; Chase S Dean; Travis J Menge; Alexander R Vap; Tyler R Cram; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-05-30

2.  In vitro comparison between cortical and cortico-cancellous femoral suspension devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: implications for mobilization.

Authors:  Cristina Rodríguez; Tomás Eduardo García; Susana Montes; Luis Rodríguez; Antonio Maestro
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Accuracy of radiographic determination of the posterior femoral wall integrity in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Joshua P Herzog; Edward D Arrington; Creighton C Tubb; Gautham Prabhakar; Nicholas J Zarkadis; Nicholas A Kusnezov
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-02-19

4.  Posterior Wall Blowout in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Review of Anatomic and Surgical Considerations.

Authors:  Justin J Mitchell; Chase S Dean; Jorge Chahla; Travis J Menge; Tyler R Cram; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2016-06-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.