Literature DB >> 22169460

Self-organizing circuitry and emergent computation in mouse embryonic stem cells.

J D Halley1, K Smith-Miles, D A Winkler, T Kalkan, S Huang, A Smith.   

Abstract

Pluripotency is a cellular state of multiple options. Here, we highlight the potential for self-organization to contribute to stem cell fate computation. A new way of considering regulatory circuitry is presented that describes the expression of each transcription factor (TF) as a branching process that propagates through time, interacting and competing with others. In a single cell, the interactions between multiple branching processes generate a collective process called 'critical-like self-organization'. We explain how this phenomenon provides a valid description of whole genome regulatory circuit dynamics. The hypothesis of exploratory stem cell decision-making proposes that critical-like self-organization (also called rapid self-organized criticality) provides the backbone for cell fate computation in regulative embryos and pluripotent stem cells. Unspecific amplification of TF expression is predicted to initiate this self-organizing circuitry, where cascades of gene expression propagate and may interact either synergistically or antagonistically. The emergent and highly dynamic circuitry is affected by various sources of selection pressure, such as the expression of TFs with disproportionate influence over other genes, and extrinsic biological and physical stimuli that differentially modulate particular gene expression cascades. Extrinsic conditions continuously trigger waves of transcription that ripple throughout regulatory networks on multiple spatiotemporal scales, providing the context within which circuitry self-organizes. In this framework, a distinction between instructive and selective mechanisms of fate determination is misleading because it is the 'interference pattern', rather than any single instructing or selecting factor, that is ultimately responsible for computing and directing cell fate. Using this framework, we consider whether the idea of a naïve ground state of pluripotency and that of a fluctuating transcriptome are compatible, and whether a ground state like that captured in vitro could exist in vivo.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22169460     DOI: 10.1016/j.scr.2011.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cell Res        ISSN: 1873-5061            Impact factor:   2.020


  10 in total

1.  Reprogramming in vivo produces teratomas and iPS cells with totipotency features.

Authors:  María Abad; Lluc Mosteiro; Cristina Pantoja; Marta Cañamero; Teresa Rayon; Inmaculada Ors; Osvaldo Graña; Diego Megías; Orlando Domínguez; Dolores Martínez; Miguel Manzanares; Sagrario Ortega; Manuel Serrano
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Side scatter intensity is highly heterogeneous in undifferentiated pluripotent stem cells and predicts clonogenic self-renewal.

Authors:  Jean-Marie Ramirez; Qiang Bai; Marie Péquignot; Fabienne Becker; Alboukadel Kassambara; Alexandra Bouin; Vasiliki Kalatzis; Marilyne Dijon-Grinand; John De Vos
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.272

3.  Archetypal Architecture Construction, Patterning, and Scaling Invariance in a 3D Embryoid Body Differentiation Model.

Authors:  Olga Gordeeva; Andrey Gordeev; Pavel Erokhov
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-04-27

4.  Identification of a novel gene signature of ES cells self-renewal fluctuation through system-wide analysis.

Authors:  Luigi Cerulo; Daniela Tagliaferri; Pina Marotta; Pietro Zoppoli; Filomena Russo; Claudia Mazio; Mario DeFelice; Michele Ceccarelli; Geppino Falco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Deconstructing transcriptional heterogeneity in pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Roshan M Kumar; Patrick Cahan; Alex K Shalek; Rahul Satija; AJay DaleyKeyser; Hu Li; Jin Zhang; Keith Pardee; David Gennert; John J Trombetta; Thomas C Ferrante; Aviv Regev; George Q Daley; James J Collins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Jun-Mediated Changes in Cell Adhesion Contribute to Mouse Embryonic Stem Cell Exit from Ground State Pluripotency.

Authors:  Giulia Veluscek; Yaoyong Li; Shen-Hsi Yang; Andrew D Sharrocks
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 6.277

7.  Self-Organizing Global Gene Expression Regulated through Criticality: Mechanism of the Cell-Fate Change.

Authors:  Masa Tsuchiya; Alessandro Giuliani; Midori Hashimoto; Jekaterina Erenpreisa; Kenichi Yoshikawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Nanog Dynamics in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells: Results from Systems Biology Approaches.

Authors:  Lucia Marucci
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 5.443

9.  Physiological controls of large-scale patterning in planarian regeneration: a molecular and computational perspective on growth and form.

Authors:  Fallon Durant; Daniel Lobo; Jennifer Hammelman; Michael Levin
Journal:  Regeneration (Oxf)       Date:  2016-04-28

10.  A conceptual and computational framework for modelling and understanding the non-equilibrium gene regulatory networks of mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Richard B Greaves; Sabine Dietmann; Austin Smith; Susan Stepney; Julianne D Halley
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.475

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.