Literature DB >> 22169253

Neuropsychological performance in bipolar I, bipolar II and unipolar depression patients: a longitudinal, naturalistic study.

Guiyun Xu1, Kangguang Lin, Dongping Rao, Yamei Dang, Huiyi Ouyang, Yangbo Guo, Jinxiang Ma, Jichong Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that cognitive deficits existed in mood disorders. Nevertheless, whether neuropsychological profiles differ three main subtypes of mood disorder (Bipolar I, Bipolar II and UP) remain understudied because most current studies include either mixed samples of bipolar I and bipolar II patients or mixed samples of different states of the illness. The main aim of the present study is to determine whether, or to some extent, specific cognitive domains could differentiate the main subtypes of mood disorders in the depressed and clinically remitted status.
METHOD: Three groups of bipolar I (n=92), bipolar II (n=131) and unipolar depression (UP) patients (n=293) were tested with a battery of neuropsychological tests both at baseline (during a depressive episode) and after 6 weeks of treatment, contrasting with 202 healthy controls on cognitive performance. The cognitive domains include processing speed, attention, memory, verbal fluency and executive function.
RESULTS: At the acute depressive state, the three patient groups (bipolar I, bipolar II and UP) showed cognitive dysfunction in processing speed, memory, verbal fluency and executive function but not in attention compared with controls. Post comparisons revealed that bipolar I depressed patients performed significantly worse in verbal fluency and executive function than bipolar II and UP depressed patients. No difference was found between bipolar II and UP depressed patients except for the visual memory. After 6 weeks of treatment, clinically remitted bipolar I and bipolar II patients only displayed cognitive impairment in processing speed and visual memory. Remitted UP patients showed cognitive impairment in executive function in addition to processing speed and visual memory. The three remitted patient groups scored similarly in processing speed and visual memory. LIMITATION: Clinically remitted patients were just recovered from a major depressive episode after 6 weeks of treatment and in relatively unstable state.
CONCLUSION: Bipolar I, bipolar II and UP patients have a similar pattern of cognitive impairment during the state of acute depressive episode, but bipolar I patients experience greater impairment than bipolar II and UP patients. In clinical remission, both bipolar and UP patients show cognitive deficits in processing speed and visual memory, and executive dysfunction might be a status-maker for bipolar disorder, but a trait-marker for UP.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22169253     DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.11.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Affect Disord        ISSN: 0165-0327            Impact factor:   4.839


  44 in total

Review 1.  Bipolar Depression and Cognitive Impairment: Shared Mechanisms and New Treatment Avenues.

Authors:  Colin A Depp; Sheena Dev; Lisa T Eyler
Journal:  Psychiatr Clin North Am       Date:  2015-12-11

2.  Neurobiological commonalities and distinctions among 3 major psychiatric disorders: a graph theoretical analysis of the structural connectome

Authors:  Shuai Wang; Gaolang Gong; Suyu Zhong; Jia Duan; Zhiyang Yin; Miao Chang; Shengnan Wei; Xiaowei Jiang; Yifang Zhou; Yanqing Tang; Fei Wang
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 6.186

3.  Neurocognitive performance as an endophenotype for mood disorder subgroups.

Authors:  Alison K Merikangas; Lihong Cui; Monica E Calkins; Tyler M Moore; Ruben C Gur; Raquel E Gur; Kathleen R Merikangas
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 4.839

4.  Prefrontal hypoactivation during working memory in bipolar II depression.

Authors:  J O Brooks; N Vizueta; C Penfold; J D Townsend; S Y Bookheimer; L L Altshuler
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 7.723

5.  Increased neural activity during overt and continuous semantic verbal fluency in major depression: mainly a failure to deactivate.

Authors:  Heidelore Backes; Bruno Dietsche; Arne Nagels; Mirjam Stratmann; Carsten Konrad; Tilo Kircher; Axel Krug
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 5.270

6.  Equivalent linear change in cognition between individuals with bipolar disorder and healthy controls over 5 years.

Authors:  Kelly A Ryan; Shervin Assari; Kaley Angers; David F Marshall; Kristin Hinrichs; Rebecca Easter; Pallavi Babu; Bethany D Pester; Scott A Langenecker; Melvin G McInnis
Journal:  Bipolar Disord       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 6.744

7.  Cognitive deficits in bipolar disorder: from acute episode to remission.

Authors:  J Volkert; M A Schiele; Julia Kazmaier; Friederike Glaser; K C Zierhut; J Kopf; S Kittel-Schneider; A Reif
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 5.270

8.  Neuropsychological deficits in major depression reflect genetic/familial risk more than clinical history: a monozygotic discordant twin-pair study.

Authors:  Kean J Hsu; Kelly C Young-Wolff; Kenneth S Kendler; Lisa J Halberstadt; Carol A Prescott
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.222

Review 9.  Cognitive training in mental disorders: update and future directions.

Authors:  Matcheri S Keshavan; Sophia Vinogradov; Judith Rumsey; Joel Sherrill; Ann Wagner
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 18.112

10.  Self-reported affective biases, but not all affective performance biases, are present in depression remission.

Authors:  Brian M Cerny; Jonathan P Stange; Leah R Kling; Elissa J Hamlat; Lisa A O'Donnell; Christen Deveney; Scott A Langenecker
Journal:  Br J Clin Psychol       Date:  2019-03-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.