Literature DB >> 22169187

Influence of teicoplanin MICs on treatment outcomes among patients with teicoplanin-treated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a hospital-based retrospective study.

Hong-Jyun Chang1, Po-Chang Hsu, Chien-Chang Yang, Leung-Kei Siu, An-Jing Kuo, Ju-Hsin Chia, Tsu-Lan Wu, Ching-Tai Huang, Ming-Hsun Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Higher vancomycin MIC values (≥1.5 mg/L via Etest) may be associated with vancomycin treatment failure among patients with serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. As there were limited similar data for teicoplanin, this retrospective cohort study intended to determine the predictive value of teicoplanin MICs for treatment failure among patients with MRSA bacteraemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with at least one blood culture positive for MRSA admitted to the hospital between January 2010 and January 2011 were reviewed. Patients with an age ≥18 years and receipt of teicoplanin therapy throughout the course or receipt of <72 h of vancomycin therapy and then teicoplanin for >3 days were enrolled. Teicoplanin Etest(®) MICs and treatment outcomes for MRSA bacteraemia were reviewed to identify the breakpoint of teicoplanin MICs influencing treatment outcomes.
RESULTS: Of the 101 patients enrolled, 56 had a lower teicoplanin MIC (≤1.5 mg/L) for MRSA and 45 had a higher MIC (>1.5 mg/L) for MRSA. A lower teicoplanin MIC was associated with a favourable outcome [37 (66.1%) versus 13 (28.9%); P<0.001] and a lower rate of bloodstream infection-related mortality [15 (26.8%) versus 22 (48.9%); P=0.022]. Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bacteraemic pneumonia or higher Pittsburgh bacteraemia score had an unfavourable outcome (P=0.028, 0.022 and <0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that teicoplanin MIC >1.5 mg/L, higher Pittsburgh bacteraemia score and bacteraemic pneumonia were independent risk factors for unfavourable outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: A higher teicoplanin MIC value (>1.5 mg/L) may predict an unfavourable outcome and higher mortality rate among teicoplanin-treated MRSA bacteraemic patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22169187     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkr531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  15 in total

1.  Heterogeneous glycopeptide intermediate Staphylococcus epidermidis isolated from prosthetic joint infections.

Authors:  S Tevell; C Claesson; B Hellmark; B Söderquist; Å Nilsdotter-Augustinsson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 2.  Multidrug-resistant bacterial infections after liver transplantation: an ever-growing challenge.

Authors:  Guilherme Santoro-Lopes; Erika Ferraz de Gouvêa
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Multicenter prospective observational study of the comparative efficacy and safety of vancomycin versus teicoplanin in patients with health care-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Authors:  Young Kyung Yoon; Dae Won Park; Jang Wook Sohn; Hyo Youl Kim; Yeon-Sook Kim; Chang-Seop Lee; Mi Suk Lee; Seong-Yeol Ryu; Hee-Chang Jang; Young Ju Choi; Cheol-In Kang; Hee Jung Choi; Seung Soon Lee; Shin Woo Kim; Sang Il Kim; Eu Suk Kim; Jeong Yeon Kim; Kyung Sook Yang; Kyong Ran Peck; Min Ja Kim
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Impact of Molecular Epidemiology and Reduced Susceptibility to Glycopeptides and Daptomycin on Outcomes of Patients with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

Authors:  Hao-Yuan Lee; Chyi-Liang Chen; Shu-Ying Liu; Yu-Shan Yan; Chee-Jen Chang; Cheng-Hsun Chiu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Vancomycin, teicoplanin, daptomycin, and linezolid MIC creep in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is associated with clonality.

Authors:  Yu-Chia Hsieh; Yu-Chun Lin; Yhu-Chering Huang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Teicoplanin-based antimicrobial therapy in Staphylococcus aureus bone and joint infection: tolerance, efficacy and experience with subcutaneous administration.

Authors:  Olivier Peeters; Tristan Ferry; Florence Ader; André Boibieux; Evelyne Braun; Anissa Bouaziz; Judith Karsenty; Emmanuel Forestier; Frédéric Laurent; Sébastien Lustig; Christian Chidiac; Florent Valour
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.090

7.  A 5-year Survey Reveals Increased Susceptibility to Glycopeptides for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Patients in a Chinese Burn Center.

Authors:  Bei Jiang; Supeng Yin; Bo You; Guangtao Huang; Zichen Yang; Yulong Zhang; Yu Chen; Jing Chen; Zhiqiang Yuan; Xiancai Rao; Xiaomei Hu; Yali Gong; Yizhi Peng
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Combination of cephalosporins with vancomycin or teicoplanin enhances antibacterial effect of glycopeptides against heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (hVISA) and VISA.

Authors:  Chih-Cheng Lai; Chi-Chung Chen; Yin-Ching Chuang; Hung-Jen Tang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Prognosis of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection treated with teicoplanin: a retrospective cohort study investigating effect of teicoplanin minimum inhibitory concentrations.

Authors:  Jann-Tay Wang; Hau-Shin Wu; Chia-Min Weng; Le-Yin Hsu; Fu-Der Wang
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 3.090

10.  Tools for the Individualized Therapy of Teicoplanin for Neonates and Children.

Authors:  V Ramos-Martín; M N Neely; K Padmore; M Peak; M W Beresford; M A Turner; S Paulus; J López-Herce; W W Hope
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.