Literature DB >> 22169135

Influence of substrate stiffness on circulating progenitor cell fate.

Emanuela S Fioretta1, Joost O Fledderus, Frank P T Baaijens, Carlijn V C Bouten.   

Abstract

In situ vascular tissue engineering (TE) aims at regenerating vessels using implanted synthetic scaffolds. An envisioned strategy is to capture and differentiate progenitor cells from the bloodstream into the porous scaffold to initiate tissue formation. Among these cells are the endothelial colonies forming cells (ECFCs) that can differentiate into endothelial cells and transdifferentiate into smooth muscle cells under biochemical stimulation. The influence of mechanical stimulation is unknown, but relevant for in situ vascular TE because the cells perceive a change in mechanical environment when captured inside the scaffold, where they are shielded from blood flow induced shear stresses. Here we investigate the effects of substrate stiffness as one of the environmental mechanical cues to control ECFC fate within scaffolds. ECFCs were seeded on soft (3.58±0.90 kPa), intermediate (21.59±2.91 kPa), and stiff (93.75±18.36 kPa) fibronectin-coated polyacrylamide gels, as well as on glass controls, and compared to peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Cell behavior was analyzed in terms of adhesion (vinculin staining), proliferation (BrdU), phenotype (CD31, αSMA staining, and flow cytometry), and collagen production (col I, III, and IV). While ECFCs adhesion and proliferation increased with substrate stiffness, no change in phenotype was observed. The cells produced no collagen type I, but abundant amounts of collagen type III and IV, albeit in a stiffness-dependent organization. PBMCs did not adhere to the gels, but they did adhere to glass, where they expressed CD31 and collagen type III. Addition mechanical cues, such as cyclic strains, should be studied to further investigate the effect of the mechanical environment on captured circulating cells for in situ TE purposes. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22169135     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.11.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  16 in total

1.  Engineering a naturally-derived adhesive and conductive cardiopatch.

Authors:  Brian W Walker; Roberto Portillo Lara; Chu Hsiang Yu; Ehsan Shirzaei Sani; William Kimball; Shannon Joyce; Nasim Annabi
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  In vitro and in vivo analysis of visible light crosslinkable gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels.

Authors:  Iman Noshadi; Seonki Hong; Kelly E Sullivan; Ehsan Shirzaei Sani; Roberto Portillo-Lara; Ali Tamayol; Su Ryon Shin; Albert E Gao; Whitney L Stoppel; Lauren D Black; Ali Khademhosseini; Nasim Annabi
Journal:  Biomater Sci       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 6.843

Review 3.  Translational Challenges in Cardiovascular Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Maximilian Y Emmert; Emanuela S Fioretta; Simon P Hoerstrup
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  CRACR2A-Mediated TCR Signaling Promotes Local Effector Th1 and Th17 Responses.

Authors:  Jin Seok Woo; Sonal Srikanth; Kyun-Do Kim; Heidi Elsaesser; Jing Lu; Matteo Pellegrini; David G Brooks; Zuoming Sun; Yousang Gwack
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 5.422

5.  An inverted dielectrophoretic device for analysis of attached single cell mechanics.

Authors:  Rebecca Lownes Urbano; Alisa Morss Clyne
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2016-02-07       Impact factor: 6.799

6.  Hydrogel biophysical properties instruct coculture-mediated osteogenic potential.

Authors:  Kaitlin C Murphy; Roberta S Stilhano; Debika Mitra; Dejie Zhou; Samir Batarni; Eduardo A Silva; J Kent Leach
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Cell response of flexible PMMA-derivatives: supremacy of surface chemistry over substrate stiffness.

Authors:  Elke Van De Walle; Ine Van Nieuwenhove; Winnok De Vos; Heidi Declercq; Peter Dubruel; Sandra Van Vlierberghe
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 8.  Integration of substrate- and flow-derived stresses in endothelial cell mechanobiology.

Authors:  Claire A Dessalles; Claire Leclech; Alessia Castagnino; Abdul I Barakat
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-06-21

9.  Development of polydimethylsiloxane substrates with tunable elastic modulus to study cell mechanobiology in muscle and nerve.

Authors:  Rachelle N Palchesko; Ling Zhang; Yan Sun; Adam W Feinberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Stem Cells on Biomaterials for Synthetic Grafts to Promote Vascular Healing.

Authors:  Patrick Babczyk; Clelia Conzendorf; Jens Klose; Margit Schulze; Kathrin Harre; Edda Tobiasch
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.