BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Electrical conduction along endothelium of resistance vessels has not been determined independently of the influence of smooth muscle, surrounding tissue or blood. Two interrelated hypotheses were tested: (i) Intercellular conduction of electrical signals is manifest in endothelial cell (EC) tubes; and (ii) Inhibitors of gap junction channels (GJCs) have confounding actions on EC electrical and Ca(2+) signalling. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Intact EC tubes were isolated from abdominal muscle feed (superior epigastric) arteries of C57BL/6 mice. Hyperpolarization was initiated with indirect (ACh) and direct (NS309) stimulation of intermediate- and small-conductance Ca(2+) -activated K(+) channels (IK(Ca) /SK(Ca) ). Remote membrane potential (V(m) ) responses to intracellular current injection defined the length constant (λ) for electrical conduction. Dye coupling was evaluated following intracellular microinjection of propidium iodide. Intracellular Ca(2+) dynamics were determined using Fura-2 photometry. Carbenoxolone (CBX) or β-glycyrrhetinic acid (βGA) was used to investigate the role of GJCs. KEY RESULTS: Steady-state V(m) of ECs was -25 mV. ACh and NS309 hyperpolarized ECs by -40 and -60 mV respectively. Electrical conduction decayed monoexponentially with distance (λ∼1.4 mm). Propidium iodide injected into one EC spread into surrounding ECs. CBX or βGA inhibited dye transfer, electrical conduction and EC hyperpolarization reversibly. Both agents elevated resting Ca(2+) while βGA inhibited responses to ACh. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Individual cells were effectively coupled to each other within EC tubes. Inhibiting GJCs with glycyrrhetinic acid derivatives blocked hyperpolarization mediated by IK(Ca) /SK(Ca) channels, regardless of Ca(2+) signalling, obviating use of these agents in distinguishing key determinants of electrical conduction along the endothelium.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Electrical conduction along endothelium of resistance vessels has not been determined independently of the influence of smooth muscle, surrounding tissue or blood. Two interrelated hypotheses were tested: (i) Intercellular conduction of electrical signals is manifest in endothelial cell (EC) tubes; and (ii) Inhibitors of gap junction channels (GJCs) have confounding actions on EC electrical and Ca(2+) signalling. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Intact EC tubes were isolated from abdominal muscle feed (superior epigastric) arteries of C57BL/6 mice. Hyperpolarization was initiated with indirect (ACh) and direct (NS309) stimulation of intermediate- and small-conductance Ca(2+) -activated K(+) channels (IK(Ca) /SK(Ca) ). Remote membrane potential (V(m) ) responses to intracellular current injection defined the length constant (λ) for electrical conduction. Dye coupling was evaluated following intracellular microinjection of propidium iodide. Intracellular Ca(2+) dynamics were determined using Fura-2 photometry. Carbenoxolone (CBX) or β-glycyrrhetinic acid (βGA) was used to investigate the role of GJCs. KEY RESULTS: Steady-state V(m) of ECs was -25 mV. ACh and NS309 hyperpolarized ECs by -40 and -60 mV respectively. Electrical conduction decayed monoexponentially with distance (λ∼1.4 mm). Propidium iodide injected into one EC spread into surrounding ECs. CBX or βGA inhibited dye transfer, electrical conduction and EC hyperpolarization reversibly. Both agents elevated resting Ca(2+) while βGA inhibited responses to ACh. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Individual cells were effectively coupled to each other within EC tubes. Inhibiting GJCs with glycyrrhetinic acid derivatives blocked hyperpolarization mediated by IK(Ca) /SK(Ca) channels, regardless of Ca(2+) signalling, obviating use of these agents in distinguishing key determinants of electrical conduction along the endothelium.
Authors: Rudi Busse; Gillian Edwards; Michel Félétou; Ingrid Fleming; Paul M Vanhoutte; Arthur H Weston Journal: Trends Pharmacol Sci Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 14.819
Authors: Shaun L Sandow; Robin Looft-Wilson; Beth Doran; T Hilton Grayson; Steven S Segal; Caryl E Hill Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2003-12-01 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Marie Billaud; Alexander W Lohman; Scott R Johnstone; Lauren A Biwer; Stephanie Mutchler; Brant E Isakson Journal: Pharmacol Rev Date: 2014-03-26 Impact factor: 25.468
Authors: Matthew J Socha; Erika M Boerman; Erik J Behringer; Rebecca L Shaw; Timothy L Domeier; Steven S Segal Journal: J Physiol Date: 2015-03-19 Impact factor: 5.182