OBJECTIVES: Radiofrequency ablation of the pulmonary veins is an accepted treatment for atrial fibrillation. An accurate knowledge of pulmonary venous anatomy and dimensions is desirable prior to such a procedure. The objective of this study was to use 64-detector row cardiac CT to investigate the changes in pulmonary venous dimensions during the cardiac cycle. METHODS: Data from 44 consecutive patients with no significant cardiovascular pathology who underwent electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated 64-detector row coronary angiography were retrospectively analysed. Average diameter and cross-sectional area were measured at 5 mm intervals from each pulmonary vein ostium, in ventricular end-diastole and ventricular end-systole, using curved multiplanar reformats. RESULTS: 4 (9.1%) patients had pulmonary vein anomalies and were excluded. In the remaining 40 patients, pulmonary vein diameter and area at the ostium were significantly larger in end-systole in all four veins, with the largest differences in the superior pulmonary veins. Dimensional changes for diameter (millimetres) and area (square millimetres) were as follows: left superior pulmonary vein, 2.5 (p<0.001), 65.48 (p<0.001); right superior pulmonary vein, 1.63 (p<0.001), 56.27 (p<0.001); left inferior pulmonary vein, 1.1 (p<0.001), 30.41 (p<0.001); and right inferior pulmonary vein, 0.68 (p=0.005), 30.14 (p=0.005). Less marked changes were seen at measurement sites further from the atrium. Interobserver correlation was high (all but one measurement >0.9). CONCLUSION: Pulmonary vein dimensions change significantly between end-systole and end-diastole, and the ostia of the superior pulmonary veins are potentially the most vulnerable to dimensional inaccuracies. ECG-gated cardiac CT may provide a more precise method of pulmonary venous dimensional measurement than non-gated techniques. Knowledge of change in pulmonary vein diameter offers interesting potential research into the effect of pulmonary vein function.
OBJECTIVES: Radiofrequency ablation of the pulmonary veins is an accepted treatment for atrial fibrillation. An accurate knowledge of pulmonary venous anatomy and dimensions is desirable prior to such a procedure. The objective of this study was to use 64-detector row cardiac CT to investigate the changes in pulmonary venous dimensions during the cardiac cycle. METHODS: Data from 44 consecutive patients with no significant cardiovascular pathology who underwent electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated 64-detector row coronary angiography were retrospectively analysed. Average diameter and cross-sectional area were measured at 5 mm intervals from each pulmonary vein ostium, in ventricular end-diastole and ventricular end-systole, using curved multiplanar reformats. RESULTS: 4 (9.1%) patients had pulmonary vein anomalies and were excluded. In the remaining 40 patients, pulmonary vein diameter and area at the ostium were significantly larger in end-systole in all four veins, with the largest differences in the superior pulmonary veins. Dimensional changes for diameter (millimetres) and area (square millimetres) were as follows: left superior pulmonary vein, 2.5 (p<0.001), 65.48 (p<0.001); right superior pulmonary vein, 1.63 (p<0.001), 56.27 (p<0.001); left inferior pulmonary vein, 1.1 (p<0.001), 30.41 (p<0.001); and right inferior pulmonary vein, 0.68 (p=0.005), 30.14 (p=0.005). Less marked changes were seen at measurement sites further from the atrium. Interobserver correlation was high (all but one measurement >0.9). CONCLUSION: Pulmonary vein dimensions change significantly between end-systole and end-diastole, and the ostia of the superior pulmonary veins are potentially the most vulnerable to dimensional inaccuracies. ECG-gated cardiac CT may provide a more precise method of pulmonary venous dimensional measurement than non-gated techniques. Knowledge of change in pulmonary vein diameter offers interesting potential research into the effect of pulmonary vein function.
Authors: Sherif F Nagueh; Christopher P Appleton; Thierry C Gillebert; Paolo N Marino; Jae K Oh; Otto A Smiseth; Alan D Waggoner; Frank A Flachskampf; Patricia A Pellikka; Arturo Evangelisa Journal: Eur J Echocardiogr Date: 2009-03
Authors: C Pappone; G Oreto; S Rosanio; G Vicedomini; M Tocchi; F Gugliotta; A Salvati; C Dicandia; M P Calabrò; P Mazzone; E Ficarra; C Di Gioia; S Gulletta; S Nardi; V Santinelli; S Benussi; O Alfieri Journal: Circulation Date: 2001-11-20 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: M Skowerski; I Wozniak-Skowerska; A Hoffmann; S Nowak; T Skowerski; M Sosnowski; A M Wnuk-Wojnar; K Mizia-Stec Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2018-07-13 Impact factor: 2.298