Literature DB >> 22167505

MR colonography without bowel cleansing or water enema: a pilot study.

A Sambrook1, D Mcateer, S Yule, P Phull.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The value of screening for colorectal cancer has been well demonstrated, and national programmes are being implemented. At present the primary imaging modality is colonoscopy, which has an associated morbidity and mortality. CT colonography (CTC) has been proposed as an alternative, but this is associated with radiation exposure and generally requires bowel preparation. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the feasibility of MR colonography (MRC) without bowel preparation or water enema for the detection of colorectal neoplasia.
METHODS: Patients scheduled for colonoscopy were invited to participate in the study; informed consent was obtained. MRC (with oral barium faecal tagging and colonic air distension) was performed 1-2 weeks before the colonoscopy. Axial T(2) weighted single-shot fast spin-echo (prone and supine) and axial T(1) weighted fast spoiled gradient-recalled (pre- and post-iv gadolinium) supine MRI sequences were performed. The examinations were reported by two gastrointestinal radiologists by consensus. Colonoscopy following standard bowel preparation was performed by a single endoscopist blinded to the MRC results. Significant lesions were defined as polyps or masses >10 mm in diameter.
RESULTS: 29 patients were studied. Colonoscopy revealed 25 mass lesions in 13 patients. MRC correctly identified four of the nine lesions >10 mm in diameter (sensitivity 44%; specificity 100%). Although specificity remained high for smaller lesions, sensitivity was poor.
CONCLUSION: This pilot study has demonstrated the feasibility of performing MRC without bowel preparation or water enema. This would seem to be a promising modality for colorectal cancer screening. Larger studies are required to determine the accuracy of this modality for the detection of colorectal neoplasia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22167505      PMCID: PMC3474058          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/26473479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  15 in total

Review 1.  Colonography by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Waleed Ajaj; Jörg F Debatin; Thomas Lauenstein
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.566

2.  Meta-analysis: computed tomographic colonography.

Authors:  Brian P Mulhall; Ganesh R Veerappan; Jeffrey L Jackson
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2005-04-19       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Detection of mass lesions with MR colonography: preliminary report.

Authors:  W Luboldt; P Steiner; P Bauerfeind; P Pelkonen; J F Debatin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Magnetic resonance colonography in the detection of colonic neoplasm in high-risk and average-risk individuals.

Authors:  Wai K Leung; Wynnie W M Lam; Justin C Y Wu; Nina M C So; Sara S L Fung; Francis K L Chan; Ka-Fai To; Deacons T K Yeung; Joseph J Y Sung
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Virtual colonoscopy using oral contrast compared with colonoscopy for the detection of patients with colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Benoit C Pineau; Electra D Paskett; G John Chen; Mark A Espeland; Kim Phillips; James P Han; Claudia Mikulaninec; David J Vining
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-Update based on new evidence.

Authors:  Sidney Winawer; Robert Fletcher; Douglas Rex; John Bond; Randall Burt; Joseph Ferrucci; Theodore Ganiats; Theodore Levin; Steven Woolf; David Johnson; Lynne Kirk; Scott Litin; Clifford Simmang
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Bleeding and perforation after outpatient colonoscopy and their risk factors in usual clinical practice.

Authors:  Linda Rabeneck; Lawrence F Paszat; Robert J Hilsden; Refik Saskin; Des Leddin; Eva Grunfeld; Elaine Wai; Meredith Goldwasser; Rinku Sutradhar; Therese A Stukel
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-09-13       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing: a prospective cross sectional study in a screening population.

Authors:  Christiane A Kuehle; Jost Langhorst; Susanne C Ladd; Thomas Zoepf; Michael Nuefer; Florian Grabellus; Joerg Barkhausen; Guido Gerken; Thomas C Lauenstein
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Magnetic resonance colonography with limited bowel preparation: a comparison of three strategies.

Authors:  Jasper Florie; Rogier E van Gelder; Brigitte Haberkorn; Erwin Birnie; Cristina Lavini; Johannes B Reitsma; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Dark-lumen MR colonography with fecal tagging: a comparison of water enema and air methods of colonic distension for detecting colonic neoplasms.

Authors:  Sonia Rodriguez Gomez; Mario Pagés Llinas; Antoni Castells Garangou; Carmen De Juan Garcia; Josep M Bordas Alsina; Jordi Rimola Gibert; Juan R Ayuso Colella; Carmen Ayuso Colella
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 7.034

View more
  1 in total

1.  Colorectal polyps and polyposis syndromes.

Authors:  Noam Shussman; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2014-01-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.