Literature DB >> 22167052

Radiographic signs of open median sternotomy in neonates and infants.

George Wu1, Camilo Jaimes, J William Gaynor, Richard I Markowitz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Leaving the median sternotomy wound open following cardiac surgery is employed to avoid cardiovascular compression. Horizontal struts can be used. Radiologists interpreting portable radiographs might be unaware of the open median sternotomy (OMS).
OBJECTIVE: To describe the frequency of radiographic signs of OMS and to increase awareness among radiologists to prevent misdiagnosis of pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiographs of 41 infants (17 girls/24 boys) with OMS were studied (age range 2 days to 8 months, mean 33 days). Central lucency and sternal edges were noted. Interclavicular distances before and after sternotomy were compared.
RESULTS: Central lucency was seen in 25/41 (61%) children. Sternal struts were apparent in 27 (66%). In 14 without struts, central lucency was present in 8 (57%). In 27 children with struts, central lucency was present in 17 (63%) and absent in 10 (37%). Split sternal centers were identified in 6/41 (15%). The mean interclavicular distance was 23.5 mm (SD = 4.39) before sternotomy and 38.2 mm (SD = 7.0 mm) after sternotomy (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: OMS has characteristic signs in the majority of cases. Recognition of these findings is useful and can prevent misinterpretation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22167052     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-011-2313-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  9 in total

1.  Outcomes after delayed sternal closure in pediatric heart operations: a 10-year experience.

Authors:  R S Iyer; J P Jacobs; M R de Leval; J Stark; M J Elliott
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Management and outcomes of delayed sternal closure after cardiac surgery in neonates and infants.

Authors:  D B McElhinney; V M Reddy; A J Parry; L Johnson; J R Fineman; F L Hanley
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Delayed sternal closure after neonatal cardiac operations.

Authors:  M Hakimi; H L Walters; W W Pinsky; M J Gallagher; J M Lyons
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Bloodstream infections increased after delayed sternal closure: cause or coincidence.

Authors:  Srikant Das; Agustin Rubio; Janet M Simsic; Paul M Kirshbom; Brian Kogon; Kirk R Kanter; Kevin Maher
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Delayed sternal closure after cardiac operations in a pediatric population.

Authors:  S Tabbutt; B W Duncan; D McLaughlin; D L Wessel; R A Jonas; P C Laussen
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  "Early" delayed sternal closure following pediatric cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Shelley Riphagen; Marilyn McDougall; Shane M Tibby; Nelson Alphonso; David Anderson; Conal Austin; Andrew Durward; Ian A Murdoch
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 7.  The incidence of congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Julien I E Hoffman; Samuel Kaplan
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-06-19       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  DELAYED STERNAL CLOSURE: A USEFUL TECHNIQUE TO PREVENT TAMPONADE OR COMPRESSION OF THE HEART.

Authors:  David A. Ott; Denton A. Cooley; John C. Norman; Frank M. Sandiford
Journal:  Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  1978-03

9.  Center variation and outcomes associated with delayed sternal closure after stage 1 palliation for hypoplastic left heart syndrome.

Authors:  Jason N Johnson; James Jaggers; Shuang Li; Sean M O'Brien; Jennifer S Li; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Marshall L Jacobs; Karl F Welke; Eric D Peterson; Sara K Pasquali
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 5.209

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.