Literature DB >> 2216649

Cross-gender perceptions of facial attributes and their relation to attractiveness: do we see them differently than they see us?

J E Meerdink1, C P Garbin, D W Leger.   

Abstract

Examination of perceptions of human facial attributes revealed that individual attributes are similarly perceived by males and females. However, patterns of attribute interrelationships differ as a function of gender of the face. Undergraduate students (N = 280) rated pictures of 40 male or female Caucasians on 12 physical attributes (e.g., nose size, face width) and overall attractiveness. The four sets of attribute ratings (defined by rater gender and picture gender) were submitted to principal components analyses, and five-factor solutions were found for each condition (accounting for about 76% of the variance). Comparisons of the four component solutions using confirmatory factor procedures revealed that male and female raters share one factor structure when rating photographs of female faces and another factor structure when rating photographs of male faces. Multiple regression analyses revealed that the patterns of attribute interrelationships were not "perceptual units" in the perception of attractiveness, and that different "rules" are used to assess the attractiveness of male and female stimuli faces. The importance of these results for models of facial attractiveness and interfacial similarity judgements are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2216649     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  4 in total

1.  Physical attractiveness and martial choice.

Authors:  B I Murstein
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1972-04

2.  Recognition for faces of own and other race.

Authors:  R S Malpass; J Kravitz
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1969-12

3.  Cross- vs. within-racial judgments of attractiveness.

Authors:  I H Bernstein; T D Lin; P McClellan
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-12

4.  Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior.

Authors:  E Walster; V Aronson; D Abrahams; L Rottman
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1966-11
  4 in total
  4 in total

1.  Upright versus upside-down faces: how interface attractiveness varies with orientation.

Authors:  K H Bäuml
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-08

2.  Facial attractiveness, symmetry, and physical fitness in young women.

Authors:  Johannes Hönekopp; Tobias Bartholomé; Gregor Jansen
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2004-06

3.  The spectacular human nose: an amplifier of individual quality?

Authors:  Se Kristine Rognmo Mikalsen; Ivar Folstad; Nigel Gilles Yoccoz; Bruno Laeng
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Proportions of the aesthetic African-Caribbean face: idealized ratios, comparison with the golden proportion and perceptions of attractiveness.

Authors:  Angelos Mantelakis; Michalis Iosifidis; Zaid B Al-Bitar; Vyron Antoniadis; David Wertheim; Umberto Garagiola; Farhad B Naini
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018-09-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.