INTRODUCTION: Billroth I gastroduodenostomy using a circular stapler is the most preferred reconstruction method after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG). The optimal stapler size for this procedure has not yet been proposed. METHODS: Sixty-five patients who underwent LADG and stapled anastomosis with a 25-mm stapler (25-mm group) and a 29-mm stapler (29-mm group) were enrolled in this study. Clinical data and gastroscopic findings at 6 and 12 months after surgery were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Postoperative complications and postprandial symptoms were similar in both groups. Gastroscopically, food materials remained more frequently in the remnant stomach in the 25-mm group than in the 29-mm group at 6 months after surgery (P=.041). Gastritis and bile reflux were observed more frequently in the 29-mm group than in the 25-mm group (P=.012 and P=.015, respectively). All these differences in the gastroscopic findings between the two groups decreased at 12 months after surgery except for reflux esophagitis, which was observed more frequently in the 29-mm group (P=.002). The length of the incision was smaller in the 25-mm group than in the 29-mm group (4.39 cm versus 4.95 cm, P=.009). CONCLUSION: A small-diameter stapler is a risk factor for gastric stasis in the early postoperative period, whereas a large-diameter stapler is a risk factor for gastritis and bile reflux in the early postoperative period and for esophagitis in the late postoperative period. Thus, a small-diameter circular stapler has more advantages over a large-diameter circular stapler. It also enables a reliable anastomosis through a smaller incision and easy handling of the stapler during anastomosis.
INTRODUCTION: Billroth I gastroduodenostomy using a circular stapler is the most preferred reconstruction method after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG). The optimal stapler size for this procedure has not yet been proposed. METHODS: Sixty-five patients who underwent LADG and stapled anastomosis with a 25-mm stapler (25-mm group) and a 29-mm stapler (29-mm group) were enrolled in this study. Clinical data and gastroscopic findings at 6 and 12 months after surgery were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Postoperative complications and postprandial symptoms were similar in both groups. Gastroscopically, food materials remained more frequently in the remnant stomach in the 25-mm group than in the 29-mm group at 6 months after surgery (P=.041). Gastritis and bile reflux were observed more frequently in the 29-mm group than in the 25-mm group (P=.012 and P=.015, respectively). All these differences in the gastroscopic findings between the two groups decreased at 12 months after surgery except for reflux esophagitis, which was observed more frequently in the 29-mm group (P=.002). The length of the incision was smaller in the 25-mm group than in the 29-mm group (4.39 cm versus 4.95 cm, P=.009). CONCLUSION: A small-diameter stapler is a risk factor for gastric stasis in the early postoperative period, whereas a large-diameter stapler is a risk factor for gastritis and bile reflux in the early postoperative period and for esophagitis in the late postoperative period. Thus, a small-diameter circular stapler has more advantages over a large-diameter circular stapler. It also enables a reliable anastomosis through a smaller incision and easy handling of the stapler during anastomosis.