Literature DB >> 22164962

Influence of demographic factors, basic blood test parameters and opioid type on propofol pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in ASA I-III patients.

Agnieszka Bienert1, Paweł Wiczling, Czesław Zaba, Zbigniew Zaba, Anna Wolc, Ryszard Marciniak, Edmund Grześkowiak, Krzysztof Kusza.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to examine population pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of propofol (CAS 2078-54-8) during total intravenous anesthesia monitored by spectral frequency index (SFx). Twenty-eight patients of ASA physical status I-III (ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists) scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included. In group I an anesthesia was induced with a bolus of propofol (2 mg/kg) and remifentanil (CAS 132875-61-7) (1.0 microg/kg), followed by a continuous infusion of remifentanil. In group II, an alfentanil (CAS 71195-58-9) (10 microg/kg) bolus dose was followed by a continuous infusion of alfentanil. The general anesthetic technique included propofol, opioid and muscle relaxant. During anesthesia, the propofol infusion rate (3-8 mg/kg/h) was adjusted to the SFx value. Venous blood samples were collected from the patients during 240 min after termination of the infusion. A two compartment model was used to describe propofol PK. A standard effect compartment model was used to describe the delay between the effect and the concentration of propofol. The SFx index was linked to the effect site concentrations through a sigmoidal Emax model. The influence of continuous (body weight, age, blood pressure, heart rate and blood oxygenation, serum protein, the erythrocyte count, hemoglobin and hematocrit, serum creatinine and creatinine clearance) and categorical (gender and the type of opioid) covariates on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters was investigated. PK/PD analysis was performed using NONMEM. All the screened covariates did not influence propofol PK and PD, except of the opioid type. The central compartment volume of propofol was larger in the presence of remifentanil than in the presence of alfentanil.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22164962     DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1300552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung        ISSN: 0004-4172


  4 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol in cancer patients undergoing major lung surgery.

Authors:  Krzysztof Przybyłowski; Joanna Tyczka; Damian Szczesny; Agnieszka Bienert; Paweł Wiczling; Katarzyna Kut; Emilia Plenzler; Roman Kaliszan; Edmund Grześkowiak
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  Application of a pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics approach to the free propofol plasma levels during coronary artery bypass grafting surgery with hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Carlos R Silva-Filho; Ricardo Antonio G Barbosa; Carlindo V Silva; Luiz M S Malbouisson; Maria José C Carmona; Silvia Regina C Jorge-Santos
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 2.365

3.  The influence of cardiac output on propofol and fentanyl pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery.

Authors:  Agnieszka Bienert; Paweł Sobczyński; Katarzyna Młodawska; Roma Hartmann-Sobczyńska; Edmund Grześkowiak; Paweł Wiczling
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 2.745

4.  [Influence of propofol dose and blood components on duration of electrical seizures in electroconvulsive therapy].

Authors:  María Luisa González Moral; Carmen Selva Sevilla; Patricia Romero Rodenas; María Teresa Tolosa Pérez; Marta Lucas Pérez-Romero; Mar Domato Lluch; Manuel Gerónimo Pardo
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-08-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.