Literature DB >> 2216473

Proximal and cognitively-induced accommodation.

M Rosenfield1, K J Ciuffreda.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate proximally-induced accommodation (PIA) at two levels of cognitive demand. PIA was assessed by comparing the open-loop accommodative responses to stimuli located at viewing distances of 6 m (0.17 D) and 0.33 m (3 D), respectively. The vergence and accommodation loops were opened by subjects monocularly viewing the targets through a 0.5 mm pin-hole. PIA was measured while subjects either were encouraged to relax and listened to popular music, or performed a relatively demanding mental arithmetic task (counting backwards in sevens). The results indicated that for 4 of the 12 subjects examined, increased cognitive demand produced a marked (greater than +/- 1.00 D) change in the magnitude of PIA. This finding suggests the presence of an interaction between the output of proximally- and cognitively-induced accommodation in these subjects. Such an interaction may hinder attempts to examine individual, non-optical components of accommodation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2216473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  9 in total

1.  Differences between naïve and expert observers' vergence and accommodative responses to a range of targets.

Authors:  Anna M Horwood; Patricia M Riddell
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Impact of Cognitive Demand during Sustained Near Tasks in Children and Adults.

Authors:  Tawna L Roberts; Ruth E Manny; Julia S Benoit; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Association between ADHD and vision problems. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alessio Bellato; John Perna; Preethi S Ganapathy; Marco Solmi; Andrea Zampieri; Samuele Cortese; Stephen V Faraone
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 13.437

4.  Receding and disparity cues aid relaxation of accommodation.

Authors:  Anna M Horwood; Patricia M Riddell
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Accommodative lag by autorefraction and two dynamic retinoscopy methods.

Authors:  Ruth E Manny; Danielle L Chandler; Mitchelle M Scheiman; Jane E Gwiazda; Susan A Cotter; Donald F Everett; Jonathan M Holmes; Leslie G Hyman; Marjean T Kulp; Don W Lyon; Wendy Marsh-Tootle; Noelle Matta; B Michele Melia; Thomas T Norton; Michael X Repka; David I Silbert; Erik M Weissberg
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Cognitive Demand and Accommodative Microfluctuations.

Authors:  Niall J Hynes; Matthew P Cufflin; Karen M Hampson; Edward A H Mallen
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-06

7.  Agreement and Repeatability of Noncycloplegic and Cycloplegic Wavefront-based Autorefraction in Children.

Authors:  Franziska G Rauscher; Heike Lange; Maryam Yahiaoui-Doktor; Helmut Tegetmeyer; Ina Sterker; Andreas Hinz; Siegfried Wahl; Peter Wiedemann; Arne Ohlendorf; Ralf Blendowske
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Accommodation and vergence response gains to different near cues characterize specific esotropias.

Authors:  Anna M Horwood; Patricia M Riddell
Journal:  Strabismus       Date:  2013-09

9.  Ocular accommodation and cognitive demand: an additional indicator besides pupil size and cardiovascular measures?

Authors:  Stephanie Jainta; Joerg Hoormann; Wolfgang Jaschinski
Journal:  J Negat Results Biomed       Date:  2008-08-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.