| Literature DB >> 22164047 |
Hyun Ho Moon1, Jong Joo Lee, Sang Yule Choi, Jae Sang Cha, Jang Mook Kang, Jong Tae Kim, Myong Chul Shin.
Abstract
Recently there have been many studies of power systems with a focus on "New and Renewable Energy" as part of "New Growth Engine Industry" promoted by the Korean government. "New And Renewable Energy"-especially focused on wind energy, solar energy and fuel cells that will replace conventional fossil fuels-is a part of the Power-IT Sector which is the basis of the SmartGrid. A SmartGrid is a form of highly-efficient intelligent electricity network that allows interactivity (two-way communications) between suppliers and consumers by utilizing information technology in electricity production, transmission, distribution and consumption. The New and Renewable Energy Program has been driven with a goal to develop and spread through intensive studies, by public or private institutions, new and renewable energy which, unlike conventional systems, have been operated through connections with various kinds of distributed power generation systems. Considerable research on smart grids has been pursued in the United States and Europe. In the United States, a variety of research activities on the smart power grid have been conducted within EPRI's IntelliGrid research program. The European Union (EU), which represents Europe's Smart Grid policy, has focused on an expansion of distributed generation (decentralized generation) and power trade between countries with improved environmental protection. Thus, there is current emphasis on a need for studies that assesses the economic efficiency of such distributed generation systems. In this paper, based on the cost of distributed power generation capacity, calculations of the best profits obtainable were made by a Monte Carlo simulation. Monte Carlo simulations that rely on repeated random sampling to compute their results take into account the cost of electricity production, daily loads and the cost of sales and generate a result faster than mathematical computations. In addition, we have suggested the optimal design, which considers the distribution loss associated with power distribution systems focus on sensing aspect and distributed power generation.Entities:
Keywords: MicroGrid; Monte Carlo; SmartGrid; distribution generator; distribution sensing; optimal configuration
Year: 2011 PMID: 22164047 PMCID: PMC3231743 DOI: 10.3390/s110807823
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Distribution Loss detail characteristics.
| - resistance loss of the overhead lines | |
| - corona loss | - conduction losses |
| - load loss of transformer resistance loss of underground lines | - loss increase by customer power factor decrease |
| - dielectric loss | - meter errors |
| - loss from low-voltage line and incoming line | |
| - loss from electric meter |
Figure 1.Monte Carlo integral calculus [12].
Peak capacity of the area and capacity of DG [14].
| 1 (Residential) | 5933.8 | 2000 (Wind) |
| 2 (Industrial) | 3500 | 3000 (Wind) |
| 3 (Residential) | 5046.1 | 2000 (PV) |
| 4 (Business ) | 5520.7 | 3000 (Fuel Cell) |
Loss data [14].
| 0.60 | 2, 6, 10, 14, 17, 21, 25, 28, 30, 34 |
| 0.75 | 1, 4, 7, 9, 12, 16, 19, 22, 24, 27, 29, 32, 35 |
| 0.80 | 3, 5, 8, 11, 13, 15, 18, 20, 23, 26, 31, 33, 36 |
Figure 2.RBTS 2BUS System.
Peak capacity of area and capacity of DG.
| 0.60 | 4 | 0.17 | 0.00 |
| 0.65 | 2 | 0.08 | 0.17 |
| 0.70 | 1 | 0.04 | 0.25 |
| 0.75 | 2 | 0.08 | 0.29 |
| 0.80 | 0 | 0 | 0.38 |
| 0.85 | 1 | 0.04 | 0.38 |
| 0.90 | 1 | 0.04 | 0.42 |
| 0.95 | 7 | 0.29 | 0.46 |
| 1 (Peak) | 6 | 0.25 | 0.75 |
The power rate of KEPCO in 2008 [16].
| Residential [Won/kWh] | 55.10 |
| Commercial [Won/kWh] | 67.90 |
| Industrial [Won/kWh] | 65.80 |
The power rate of DG [16].
| Wind Turbine Generator [Won/kWh] | 107.29 |
| Solar Power Generator [Won/kWh] | 667.38 |
| Fuel Cell [Won/kWh] | 282.54 |
The power rate of DG.
| 0.30 | 34 | 0.01 |
| 0.35 | 10, 28 | 0.02 |
| 0.40 | 25, 30 | 0.03 |
| 0.45 | 6, 14 | 0.03 |
| 0.50 | 7, 26, 35 | 0.08 |
| 0.55 | 2, 27 | 0.05 |
| 0.60 | 17, 24, 36 | 0.09 |
| 0.65 | 1, 21, 22 | 0.09 |
| 0.70 | 4, 20, 32 | 0.11 |
| 0.75 | 9, 21, 19 | 0.10 |
| 0.80 | 5, 11, 15, 16 | 0.13 |
| 0.85 | 3, 8, 12, 33 | 0.01 |
| 0.90 | 13, 18 | 0.06 |
| 0.95 | 23, 29 | 0.07 |
| 1 (Peak) | 31 | 0.03 |
Figure 3.Flow chart of Monte Carlo Simulation.
Figure 4.Profit graph of DG1 (Wind).
Figure 7.Profit graph of DG4 (Fuel Cell).
Figure 8.Optimal configuration of RBTS 2BUS system.