Literature DB >> 2216372

A comparative study of temporomandibular symptoms following mandibular advancement by bilateral sagittal split osteotomies: rigid versus nonrigid fixation.

B Flynn1, D T Brown, T H Lapp, D A Bussard, W E Roberts.   

Abstract

Rigid fixation to attach proximal and distal segments during bony healing of osteotomy sites has become increasingly popular. The effects of rigid fixation on the temporomandibular joints have been questioned. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of rigid fixation after bilateral sagittal split osteotomies on temporomandibular dysfunction symptoms. Forty patients who had mandibular advancement surgery were evaluated for temporomandibular joint dysfunction. Twenty had received rigid fixation, and twenty had received nonrigid fixation. It was determined that there was no statistically significant difference in temporomandibular signs or symptoms between patients who were treated with rigid internal fixation for bilateral sagittal split osteotomies for mandibular advancement and those patients who were treated with nonrigid wire fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2216372     DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(90)90163-m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol        ISSN: 0030-4220


  2 in total

1.  Use of the Mitek anchor in temporomandibular joint disc-repositioning surgery.

Authors:  P Mehra; L M Wolford
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2001-01

Review 2.  TMJ response to mandibular advancement surgery: an overview of risk factors.

Authors:  José Valladares-Neto; Lucia Helena Cevidanes; Wesley Cabral Rocha; Guilherme de Araújo Almeida; João Batista de Paiva; José Rino-Neto
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.