Literature DB >> 22163499

Evaluation of high-precision sensors in structural monitoring.

Bihter Erol1.   

Abstract

One of the most intricate branches of metrology involves the monitoring of displacements and deformations of natural and anthropogenic structures under environmental forces, such as tidal or tectonic phenomena, or ground water level changes. Technological progress has changed the measurement process, and steadily increasing accuracy requirements have led to the continued development of new measuring instruments. The adoption of an appropriate measurement strategy, with proper instruments suited for the characteristics of the observed structure and its environmental conditions, is of high priority in the planning of deformation monitoring processes. This paper describes the use of precise digital inclination sensors in continuous monitoring of structural deformations. The topic is treated from two viewpoints: (i) evaluation of the performance of inclination sensors by comparing them to static and continuous GPS observations in deformation monitoring and (ii) providing a strategy for analyzing the structural deformations. The movements of two case study objects, a tall building and a geodetic monument in Istanbul, were separately monitored using dual-axes micro-radian precision inclination sensors (inclinometers) and GPS. The time series of continuous deformation observations were analyzed using the Least Squares Spectral Analysis Technique (LSSA). Overall, the inclinometers showed good performance for continuous monitoring of structural displacements, even at the sub-millimeter level. Static GPS observations remained insufficient for resolving the deformations to the sub-centimeter level due to the errors that affect GPS signals. With the accuracy advantage of inclination sensors, their use with GPS provides more detailed investigation of deformation phenomena. Using inclinometers and GPS is helpful to be able to identify the components of structural responses to the natural forces as static, quasi-static, or resonant.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GPS sensor; engineering structures; geodetic monuments; inclination sensor; spectral analysis; structural deformations

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 22163499      PMCID: PMC3231072          DOI: 10.3390/s101210803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sensors (Basel)        ISSN: 1424-8220            Impact factor:   3.576


  2 in total

1.  Power spectral density of unevenly sampled data by least-square analysis: performance and application to heart rate signals.

Authors:  P Laguna; G B Moody; R G Mark
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Use of terrestrial laser scanning technology for long term high precision deformation monitoring.

Authors:  Rok Vezočnik; Tomaž Ambrožič; Oskar Sterle; Gregor Bilban; Norbert Pfeifer; Bojan Stopar
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 3.576

  2 in total
  5 in total

1.  Three-dimensional laser scanning for geometry documentation and construction management of highway tunnels during excavation.

Authors:  Vassilis Gikas
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 3.576

2.  Time-frequency analyses of tide-gauge sensor data.

Authors:  Serdar Erol
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Monitoring Bridge Dynamic Responses Using Fiber Bragg Grating Tiltmeters.

Authors:  Feng Xiao; Gang S Chen; J Leroy Hulsey
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Robust In-Plane Structures Oscillation Monitoring by Terrestrial Photogrammetry.

Authors:  Omar El-Kadi; Adel El-Shazly; Khaled Nassar
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Field Measurement-Based System Identification and Dynamic Response Prediction of a Unique MIT Building.

Authors:  Young-Jin Cha; Peter Trocha; Oral Büyüköztürk
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.