Literature DB >> 22163068

Covariate-adjusted nonparametric analysis of magnetic resonance images using Markov chain Monte Carlo.

Haley Hedlin1, Brian Caffo, Ziyad Mahfoud, Susan Spear Bassett.   

Abstract

Permutation tests are useful for drawing inferences from imaging data because of their flexibility and ability to capture features of the brain under minimal assumptions. However, most implementations of permutation tests ignore important confounding covariates. To employ covariate control in a nonparametric setting we have developed a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm for conditional permutation testing using propensity scores. We present the first use of this methodology for imaging data. Our MCMC algorithm is an extension of algorithms developed to approximate exact conditional probabilities in contingency tables, logit, and log-linear models. An application of our nonparametric method to remove potential bias due to the observed covariates is presented.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 22163068      PMCID: PMC3232683          DOI: 10.4310/sii.2010.v3.n1.a11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Interface        ISSN: 1938-7989            Impact factor:   0.582


  16 in total

Review 1.  Invited commentary: propensity scores.

Authors:  M M Joffe; P R Rosenbaum
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Global, voxel, and cluster tests, by theory and permutation, for a difference between two groups of structural MR images of the brain.

Authors:  E T Bullmore; J Suckling; S Overmeyer; S Rabe-Hesketh; E Taylor; M J Brammer
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Exact tests of goodness of fit of log-linear models for rates.

Authors:  J W McDonald; P W Smith; J J Forster
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Validating cluster size inference: random field and permutation methods.

Authors:  Satoru Hayasaka; Thomas E Nichols
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  The relationships between age, sex, and the incidence of dementia and Alzheimer disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Gao; H C Hendrie; K S Hall; S Hui
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1998-09

6.  Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group.

Authors:  R B D'Agostino
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 7.  The analysis of functional magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  S Rabe-Hesketh; E T Bullmore; M J Brammer
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.021

8.  Tests for comparing images based on randomization and permutation methods.

Authors:  S Arndt; T Cizadlo; N C Andreasen; D Heckel; S Gold; D S O'Leary
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 9.  Nonparametric analysis of statistic images from functional mapping experiments.

Authors:  A P Holmes; R C Blair; J D Watson; I Ford
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 6.200

10.  Apolipoprotein E: high-avidity binding to beta-amyloid and increased frequency of type 4 allele in late-onset familial Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  W J Strittmatter; A M Saunders; D Schmechel; M Pericak-Vance; J Enghild; G S Salvesen; A D Roses
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-03-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  1 in total

1.  Population heterogeneity in clinical cohorts affects the predictive accuracy of brain imaging.

Authors:  Oualid Benkarim; Casey Paquola; Bo-Yong Park; Valeria Kebets; Seok-Jun Hong; Reinder Vos de Wael; Shaoshi Zhang; B T Thomas Yeo; Michael Eickenberg; Tian Ge; Jean-Baptiste Poline; Boris C Bernhardt; Danilo Bzdok
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 9.593

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.