Literature DB >> 22162852

Ants might use different view-matching strategies on and off the route.

Antoine Wystrach1, Guy Beugnon, Ken Cheng.   

Abstract

Individual foraging ants are known to rely on views of their surroundings for route learning and for pinpointing goals. Different strategies have been proposed to explain how ants might process visual information for navigation, but little is known about the actual development and nature of the view-based strategies used by ants in complex natural environments. Here, we constrained the knowledge of Melophorus bagoti ants to either the nest vicinity or a curved route (length 10 m) and analysed their initial direction when released at both novel and familiar locations. In parallel, we used 360 deg pictures of the scene as a basis for modelling different navigational strategies. We propose here a new hypothesis based on skyline height comparison to explain how ants home from novel locations. Interestingly, this strategy succeeded well at novel locations but failed on familiar terrain. By contrast, the use of a visual compass strategy failed at novel locations but could explain the results on familiar routes. We suggest that ants might switch between skyline height comparison and a visual compass strategy, depending on whether they are on familiar terrain or not. How ants could switch between strategies and how their memories develop are discussed in turn.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22162852     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.059584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  31 in total

1.  Optimal cue integration in ants.

Authors:  Antoine Wystrach; Michael Mangan; Barbara Webb
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Mapping the navigational knowledge of individually foraging ants, Myrmecia croslandi.

Authors:  Ajay Narendra; Sarah Gourmaud; Jochen Zeil
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Looking and homing: how displaced ants decide where to go.

Authors:  Jochen Zeil; Ajay Narendra; Wolfgang Stürzl
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Backtracking behaviour in lost ants: an additional strategy in their navigational toolkit.

Authors:  Antoine Wystrach; Sebastian Schwarz; Alice Baniel; Ken Cheng
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Rotation invariant visual processing for spatial memory in insects.

Authors:  Thomas Stone; Michael Mangan; Antoine Wystrach; Barbara Webb
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 3.906

6.  Three-dimensional models of natural environments and the mapping of navigational information.

Authors:  Wolfgang Stürzl; Iris Grixa; Elmar Mair; Ajay Narendra; Jochen Zeil
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Route-segment odometry and its interactions with global path-integration.

Authors:  Thomas S Collett; Matthew Collett
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 8.  Path integration, views, search, and matched filters: the contributions of Rüdiger Wehner to the study of orientation and navigation.

Authors:  Ken Cheng; Cody A Freas
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Skyline retention and retroactive interference in the navigating Australian desert ant, Melophorus bagoti.

Authors:  Cody A Freas; Christopher Whyte; Ken Cheng
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Terrestrial cue learning and retention during the outbound and inbound foraging trip in the desert ant, Cataglyphis velox.

Authors:  Cody A Freas; Marcia L Spetch
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.