Literature DB >> 22161381

Oral rehydration salt solution for treating cholera: ≤ 270 mOsm/L solutions vs ≥ 310 mOsm/L solutions.

Alfred Musekiwa1, Jimmy Volmink.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oral rehydration solution (ORS) is used to treat the dehydration caused by diarrhoeal diseases, including cholera. ORS formulations with an osmolarity (a measure of solute concentration) of ≤ 270 mOsm/L (ORS ≤ 270) are safe and more effective than ORS formulations with an osmolarity of ≥ 310 mOsm/L (ORS ≥ 310) for treating non-cholera diarrhoea. As cholera causes rapid electrolyte loss, it is important to know if these benefits are similar for people suffering from cholera.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety and efficacy of ORS ≤270 with ORS ≥ 310 for treating dehydration due to cholera. SEARCH
METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Infectious Disease Group Specialized Register (April 2011), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2011), MEDLINE (1966 to April 2011), EMBASE (1974 to April 2011), and LILACS (1982 to April 2011). We also contacted organizations and searched reference lists. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials comparing ORS ≤ 270 with ORS ≥ 310 for treating adults and children with acute diarrhoea due to cholera. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently applied eligibility criteria, assessed trial quality, and extracted data. We pooled dichotomous data using risk ratio (RR), pooled continuous data using mean difference (MD) or the standardized mean difference (SMD), and presented the results with 95% confidence intervals (CI). MAIN
RESULTS: For glucose-based ORS, seven trials (718 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Biochemical hyponatraemia (blood sodium levels < 130 mmol/L) was more common with ORS ≤ 270 (RR 1.67, CI 1.09 to 2.57; 465 participants, four trials), while a higher level of severe biochemical hyponatraemia (blood sodium levels < 125 mmol/L) in the same group was not significant (RR 1.58, CI 0.62 to 4.04; 465 participants, four trials). No instances of symptomatic hyponatraemia or death were noted in the trials that intended to record them. We found no statistically significant difference in the need for unscheduled intravenous infusion. Analyses separating children and adults showed no obvious trends.Two trials also examined rice-based ORS. In the ORS ≤ 270 group, duration of diarrhoea was shorter (MD -11.42 hours, CI -13.80 to -9.04; 102 participants, two trials). AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: In people with cholera, ORS ≤ 270 is associated with biochemical hyponatraemia when compared with ORS ≥ 310, but there are no differences in terms of other outcomes. Although this risk does not appear to be associated with any serious consequences, the total patient experience in existing trials is small. Under wider practice conditions, especially where patient monitoring is difficult, caution is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22161381      PMCID: PMC6532622          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003754.pub3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  26 in total

1.  The search for a better oral rehydration solution for cholera.

Authors:  G H Rabbani
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-02-03       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  A better oral rehydration solution?. An important step, but not a leap forward.

Authors:  G J Fuchs
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-07-14

3.  Cholera, 2000.

Authors: 
Journal:  Wkly Epidemiol Rec       Date:  2001-08-03

Review 4.  Oral rehydration: toward a real solution.

Authors:  A Guarino; F Albano; S Guandalini
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.839

5.  Controlled trial of hypo-osmalar versus World Health Organization oral rehydration solution.

Authors:  S Alam; K Afzal; M Maheshwari; I Shukla
Journal:  Indian Pediatr       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.411

6.  Double blind, randomised controlled clinical trial of hypo-osmolar oral rehydration salt solution in dehydrating acute diarrhoea in severely malnourished (marasmic) children.

Authors:  P Dutta; U Mitra; B Manna; S K Niyogi; K Roy; C Mondal; S K Bhattacharya
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Efficacy and safety of oral rehydration solution with reduced osmolarity in adults with cholera: a randomised double-blind clinical trial. CHOICE study group.

Authors:  N H Alam; R N Majumder; G J Fuchs
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-07-24       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Reduced osmolarity oral rehydration solution for treating dehydration caused by acute diarrhoea in children.

Authors:  S Hahn; S Kim; P Garner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2002

9.  Evaluation of oral hypo-osmolar glucose-based and rice-based oral rehydration solutions in the treatment of cholera in children.

Authors:  D Dutta; M K Bhattacharya; A K Deb; D Sarkar; A Chatterjee; A B Biswas; K Chatterjee; G B Nair; S K Bhattacharya
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.299

10.  Multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a reduced osmolarity oral rehydration salts solution in children with acute watery diarrhea.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of Recommendations in Clinical Practice Guidelines for Acute Gastroenteritis in Children.

Authors:  Andrea Lo Vecchio; Jorge Amil Dias; James A Berkley; Chris Boey; Mitchell B Cohen; Sylvia Cruchet; Ilaria Liguoro; Eduardo Salazar Lindo; Bhupinder Sandhu; Philip Sherman; Toshiaki Shimizu; Alfredo Guarino
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.839

2.  2017 Infectious Diseases Society of America Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Infectious Diarrhea.

Authors:  Andi L Shane; Rajal K Mody; John A Crump; Phillip I Tarr; Theodore S Steiner; Karen Kotloff; Joanne M Langley; Christine Wanke; Cirle Alcantara Warren; Allen C Cheng; Joseph Cantey; Larry K Pickering
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Oral salt and water versus intravenous saline for the prevention of acute kidney injury following contrast-enhanced computed tomography: study protocol for a pilot randomized trial.

Authors:  Hiremath Swapnil; Greg A Knoll; Jeanne Françoise Kayibanda; Dean Fergusson; Benjamin Jw Chow; Wael Shabana; Erin Murphy; Tim Ramsay; Matthew James; Christine A White; Amit Garg; Ron Wald; Jeffrey Hoch; Ayub Akbari
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2015-04-16

4.  'First 1000 days' health interventions in low- and middle-income countries: alignment of South African policies with high-quality evidence.

Authors:  René English; Nazia Peer; Simone Honikman; Aviva Tugendhaft; Karen J Hofman
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.640

Review 5.  Cholera diagnosis in human stool and detection in water: protocol for a systematic review of available technologies.

Authors:  Karin Diaconu; Jennifer Falconer; Fiona O'May; Miguel Jimenez; Joe Matragrano; Betty Njanpop-Lafourcade; Alastair Ager
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2018-02-20

6.  Gold Standard Cholera Diagnostics Are Tarnished by Lytic Bacteriophage and Antibiotics.

Authors:  E J Nelson; J A Grembi; D L Chao; J R Andrews; L Alexandrova; P H Rodriguez; V V Ramachandran; M A Sayeed; J F Wamala; A K Debes; D A Sack; A J Hryckowian; F Haque; S Khatun; M Rahman; A Chien; A M Spormann; G K Schoolnik
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Essential interventions for child health.

Authors:  Zohra S Lassi; Dania Mallick; Jai K Das; Lekho Mal; Rehana A Salam; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.223

Review 8.  Issues and Controversies in the Evolution of Oral Rehydration Therapy (ORT).

Authors:  David Nalin
Journal:  Trop Med Infect Dis       Date:  2021-03-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.