Literature DB >> 22159339

[Is a differentiation between low-level and higher phonological processing in primary school children justified?].

M Ptok1, F Altwein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several sensory, perceptual and cognitive processes contribute to phonological processing. Distinguishing between low- and high-level phonological processing has proven useful in clinical tests (speech and language diagnostics). Only in the case of the latter is it necessary to operate consciously with speech sounds. This study aims to evaluate whether the aforementioned differentiation between low- and high-level phonological processing is justified.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective correlation analysis was carried out using the data from 85 primary school children (6.7-11.3 years old) on low- and high-level phonological processing.
RESULTS: Total values showed a moderate to strong correlation between the results of low- and high-level phonological processing. The subscales showed correlation coefficients below 0.5. DISCUSSION: Results confirm that a differentiation between low- and high-level phonological processing, as mentioned above, is justified. Future studies will need to clarify whether therapeutic strategies which take a differentiation of this kind into account are more effective than broad-based or unspecific therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22159339     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-011-2378-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  12 in total

1.  [The relationship between minimal pair reproduction and writing skills].

Authors:  M Ptok; R Meisen
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  When reading is "readn" or somthn. Distinctness of phonological representations of lexical items in normal and disabled readers.

Authors:  C Elbro
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  1998-09

3.  Changing relations between phonological processing abilities and word-level reading as children develop from beginning to skilled readers: a 5-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  R K Wagner; J K Torgesen; C A Rashotte; S A Hecht; T A Barker; S R Burgess; J Donahue; T Garon
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  1997-05

4.  The relationship between speech-language impairments and reading disabilities.

Authors:  H W Catts
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1993-10

5.  Learning to read: the role of short-term memory and phonological skills.

Authors:  S McDougall; C Hulme; A Ellis; A Monk
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1994-08

6.  [Factorial structure of the BAKO 1-4. On the validation of the "Base competence for school years 1-4" test for determining phonological processing].

Authors:  M Ptok; N Buller
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  [Norms for the Mottier-Test from 4- to 6-year old children].

Authors:  C Kiese-Himmel; T Risse
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 8.  Developmental dyslexia: specific phonological deficit or general sensorimotor dysfunction?

Authors:  Franck Ramus
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  Toward an understanding of developmental language and reading disorders.

Authors:  A G Kamhi; H W Catts
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1986-11

Review 10.  [Developmental dyslexia: the role of phonological processing for the development of literacy].

Authors:  M Ptok; K Berendes; S Gottal; B Grabherr; J Schneeberg; M Wittler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.