OBJECTIVE: Recently, diabetes prevalence has increased in South Asians making it a global public health priority. There are suggestions that pre-diabetes, including impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), may not be increasing. We conducted a systematic review to explore the paradox. Research Design and Methods We searched electronic databases from inception to June 2009 for cross-sectional studies providing prevalence of pre-diabetes (using WHO criteria) in South Asian adult populations. Two reviewers independently screened articles, performed data extraction, quality appraisal and study classification with any discrepancies resolved by consensus. Repeated cross-sectional studies, categorized by pre-specified criteria, were used for the primary analysis, supplemented by analysis of comparable and all studies. RESULTS: In total, 79 cross-sectional data sets (from 69 published studies) were identified resulting in the inclusion of 179 408 people. Four sets of repeated cross-sectional studies, conducted in Chennai, rural Tamil Nadu, Mauritius and Singapore (n = 30,399), provided time trend information. Three of them showed an increase in diabetes prevalence (P < 0.001) whereas IGT fell in two (P < 0.05), and was stable in the remainder. A similar pattern was seen among three other sets of comparable studies (n = 58,820) and in scatterplots of all 79 data sets. CONCLUSION: This novel systematic review is the first to assess secular trends of pre-diabetes in any population. The data show diabetes prevalence is rising, whereas IGT prevalence is stable or falling. Explanations include: recent environmental or lifestyle changes favouring an increased rate of conversion from IGT to diabetes, or a cohort effect with improving maternal and infant nutrition resulting in reduced IGT with a fall in diabetes to follow.
OBJECTIVE: Recently, diabetes prevalence has increased in South Asians making it a global public health priority. There are suggestions that pre-diabetes, including impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), may not be increasing. We conducted a systematic review to explore the paradox. Research Design and Methods We searched electronic databases from inception to June 2009 for cross-sectional studies providing prevalence of pre-diabetes (using WHO criteria) in South Asian adult populations. Two reviewers independently screened articles, performed data extraction, quality appraisal and study classification with any discrepancies resolved by consensus. Repeated cross-sectional studies, categorized by pre-specified criteria, were used for the primary analysis, supplemented by analysis of comparable and all studies. RESULTS: In total, 79 cross-sectional data sets (from 69 published studies) were identified resulting in the inclusion of 179 408 people. Four sets of repeated cross-sectional studies, conducted in Chennai, rural Tamil Nadu, Mauritius and Singapore (n = 30,399), provided time trend information. Three of them showed an increase in diabetes prevalence (P < 0.001) whereas IGT fell in two (P < 0.05), and was stable in the remainder. A similar pattern was seen among three other sets of comparable studies (n = 58,820) and in scatterplots of all 79 data sets. CONCLUSION: This novel systematic review is the first to assess secular trends of pre-diabetes in any population. The data show diabetes prevalence is rising, whereas IGT prevalence is stable or falling. Explanations include: recent environmental or lifestyle changes favouring an increased rate of conversion from IGT to diabetes, or a cohort effect with improving maternal and infant nutrition resulting in reduced IGT with a fall in diabetes to follow.
Authors: Anne Douglas; Raj S Bhopal; Ruby Bhopal; John F Forbes; Jason M R Gill; John McKnight; Gordon Murray; Naveed Sattar; Anu Sharma; Sunita Wallia; Sarah Wild; Aziz Sheikh Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2013-02-22 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Novie Safita; Sheikh Mohammed Shariful Islam; Clara K Chow; Louis Niessen; Andreas Lechner; Rolf Holle; Michael Laxy Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Rathi Ravindrarajah; David Reeves; Elizabeth Howarth; Rachel Meacock; Claudia Soiland-Reyes; Sarah Cotterill; William Whittaker; Simon Heller; Matt Sutton; Peter Bower; Evangelos Kontopantelis Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-09-06 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Zarish Noreen; Jessica DeJesus; Attya Bhatti; Christopher A Loffredo; Peter John; Jahangir S Khan; Gail Nunlee-Bland; Somiranjan Ghosh Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-07-26 Impact factor: 3.390