BACKGROUND: Fragile X syndrome is associated with low ovarian reserve and poor ovarian response. The aim of this study was to investigate whether CGG repeats on the fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) gene have predictive value for ovarian response to stimulation with gonadotrophins and for clinical outcome in our oocyte donation program. METHODS: Oocyte donor candidates were selected according to Instituto Bernabeu oocyte donation program requirements. Fragile X genetic screening was performed in 204 oocyte donors, defining 141 controls and 63 cases: 35-39 repeats (n = 34), 40-45 (n = 12) and >45 (n = 17). All the patients underwent ovarian stimulation using a GnRH antagonist protocol and received a GnRH agonist trigger. The main factors used to measure outcome were oocyte yields, days of stimulation, gonadotrophin dosages, biochemical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy and miscarriage rates. RESULTS: No differences between the study group and controls were reported in oocyte yields (17.5 versus 18.9) or days of stimulation (11.40 versus 9.82). The control group used significantly more gonadotrophin (2212 versus 1850 IU) than the study group. Clinical outcome was not affected by the CGG repeats on the FMR1 gene in oocyte donors. CONCLUSIONS: No negative effect was observed for intermediate-sized CGG repeats on ovarian stimulation and clinical outcome using a non-confounding model of oocyte donation. These results disagree with previous studies performed on infertility patients. Owing to the present study, fragile X genetic screening should not be considered for prediction of response to ovarian stimulation.
BACKGROUND:Fragile X syndrome is associated with low ovarian reserve and poor ovarian response. The aim of this study was to investigate whether CGG repeats on the fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) gene have predictive value for ovarian response to stimulation with gonadotrophins and for clinical outcome in our oocyte donation program. METHODS: Oocyte donor candidates were selected according to Instituto Bernabeu oocyte donation program requirements. Fragile X genetic screening was performed in 204 oocyte donors, defining 141 controls and 63 cases: 35-39 repeats (n = 34), 40-45 (n = 12) and >45 (n = 17). All the patients underwent ovarian stimulation using a GnRH antagonist protocol and received a GnRH agonist trigger. The main factors used to measure outcome were oocyte yields, days of stimulation, gonadotrophin dosages, biochemical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy and miscarriage rates. RESULTS: No differences between the study group and controls were reported in oocyte yields (17.5 versus 18.9) or days of stimulation (11.40 versus 9.82). The control group used significantly more gonadotrophin (2212 versus 1850 IU) than the study group. Clinical outcome was not affected by the CGG repeats on the FMR1 gene in oocyte donors. CONCLUSIONS: No negative effect was observed for intermediate-sized CGG repeats on ovarian stimulation and clinical outcome using a non-confounding model of oocyte donation. These results disagree with previous studies performed on infertilitypatients. Owing to the present study, fragile X genetic screening should not be considered for prediction of response to ovarian stimulation.
Authors: Lisa M Pastore; Mindy S Christianson; Bailey McGuinness; Kamaria Cayton Vaught; Jacqueline Y Maher; William G Kearns Journal: Reprod Biomed Online Date: 2018-12-10 Impact factor: 3.828
Authors: Bat-Sheva L Maslow; Stephanie Davis; Lawrence Engmann; John C Nulsen; Claudio A Benadiva Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2016-05-17 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Jessica Klusek; Anna Porter; Leonard Abbeduto; Tatyana Adayev; Flora Tassone; Marsha R Mailick; Anne Glicksman; Bridgette L Tonnsen; Jane E Roberts Journal: Front Genet Date: 2018-08-24 Impact factor: 4.599
Authors: Norbert Gleicher; Ann Kim; David H Barad; Aya Shohat-Tal; Emanuela Lazzaroni; Tamar Michaeli; Ho-Joon Lee; Vitaly A Kushnir; Andrea Weghofer Journal: Reprod Biol Endocrinol Date: 2013-08-16 Impact factor: 5.211
Authors: Vitaly A Kushnir; Yao Yu; David H Barad; Andrea Weghofer; Eric Himaya; Ho-Joon Lee; Yan-Guang Wu; Aya Shohat-Tal; Emanuela Lazzaroni-Tealdi; Norbert Gleicher Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-07-14 Impact factor: 3.240