Literature DB >> 22157846

Cognitive errors detected in anaesthesiology: a literature review and pilot study.

M P Stiegler1, J P Neelankavil, C Canales, A Dhillon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cognitive errors are thought-process errors, or thinking mistakes, which lead to incorrect diagnoses, treatments, or both. This psychology of decision-making has received little formal attention in anaesthesiology literature, although it is widely appreciated in other safety cultures, such as aviation, and other medical specialities. We sought to identify which types of cognitive errors are most important in anaesthesiology.
METHODS: This study consisted of two parts. First, we created a cognitive error catalogue specific to anaesthesiology practice using a literature review, modified Delphi method with experts, and a survey of academic faculty. In the second part, we observed for those cognitive errors during resident physician management of simulated anaesthesiology emergencies.
RESULTS: Of >30 described cognitive errors, the modified Delphi method yielded 14 key items experts felt were most important and prevalent in anaesthesiology practice (Table 1). Faculty survey responses narrowed this to a 'top 10' catalogue consisting of anchoring, availability bias, premature closure, feedback bias, framing effect, confirmation bias, omission bias, commission bias, overconfidence, and sunk costs (Table 2). Nine types of cognitive errors were selected for observation during simulated emergency management. Seven of those nine types of cognitive errors occurred in >50% of observed emergencies (Table 3).
CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive errors are thought to contribute significantly to medical mishaps. We identified cognitive errors specific to anaesthesiology practice. Understanding the key types of cognitive errors specific to anaesthesiology is the first step towards training in metacognition and de-biasing strategies, which may improve patient safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22157846     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aer387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  22 in total

1.  Outbreak Column 16: Cognitive errors in outbreak decision making.

Authors:  Evonne T Curran
Journal:  J Infect Prev       Date:  2015-01-05

Review 2.  Maternal death: lessons for anaesthesia and critical care.

Authors:  A Walls; F Plaat; A M Delgado
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2022-02-16

Review 3.  Understanding Decision Making in Critical Care.

Authors:  Geoffrey K Lighthall; Cristina Vazquez-Guillamet
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2015-09-20

4.  Simulation-based assessment to evaluate cognitive performance in an anesthesiology residency program.

Authors:  Avner Sidi; Tezcan Ozrazgat Baslanti; Nikolaus Gravenstein; Samsun Lampotang
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2014-03

5.  They did what ... ?

Authors:  Robert B Schonberger; Paul G Barash
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Retroperitoneal Hematoma Following Elective Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Case Report.

Authors:  Spencer Holowachuk; Martin Ma; George Oreopoulos
Journal:  A A Pract       Date:  2020-06

7.  Cognitive debiasing 2: impediments to and strategies for change.

Authors:  Pat Croskerry; Geeta Singhal; Sílvia Mamede
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 7.035

8.  Necrotizing Fasciitis: An Emergency Medicine Simulation Scenario.

Authors:  Henrik Galust; Matthew H Oliverio; Daniel J Giorgio; Alexis M Espinal; Rami Ahmed
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2016-08-31

9.  Immersive high fidelity simulation of critically ill patients to study cognitive errors: a pilot study.

Authors:  Shivesh Prakash; Shailesh Bihari; Penelope Need; Cyle Sprick; Lambert Schuwirth
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults.

Authors:  C Frerk; V S Mitchell; A F McNarry; C Mendonca; R Bhagrath; A Patel; E P O'Sullivan; N M Woodall; I Ahmad
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 9.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.