| Literature DB >> 22157208 |
Yebin Tao1, Wei Huang, Xiaoliang Huang, Liuju Zhong, Shou-En Lu, Yi Li, Lingzhen Dai, Yuanhang Zhang, Tong Zhu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Epidemiologic studies have attributed adverse health effects to air pollution; however, controversy remains regarding the relationship between ambient oxidants [ozone (O₃) and nitrogen dioxide (NO₂)] and mortality, especially in Asia. We conducted a four-city time-series study to investigate acute effects of O₃ and NO₂ in the Pearl River Delta (PRD) of southern China, using data from 2006 through 2008.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22157208 PMCID: PMC3295344 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1103715
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Perspect ISSN: 0091-6765 Impact factor: 9.031
Figure 1The PRD and locations of air pollution monitors in the four cities included in the study: Guangzhou, Foshan, Zhongshan, and Zhuhai.
Summary statistics of daily mortality counts in the PRD cities, 2006–2008 [mean ± SD (range)].
| Mortality | Guangzhou | Foshan | Zhongshan | Zhuhai | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | ||||||||
| Nonaccidental | 83.2 ± 16.5 (47–173) | 24.5 ± 8.2 (0–104) | 20.7 ± 6.1 (5–52) | 8.5 ± 3.2 (1–22) | ||||
| Female | 36.5 ± 9.2 (15–87) | 10.9 ± 4.5 (0–45) | 9.1 ± 3.6 (1–25) | 3.7 ± 2.1 (0–12) | ||||
| Male | 46.7 ± 9.8 (20–94) | 13.6 ± 5.2 (0–59) | 11.6 ± 4.0 (1–27) | 4.8 ± 2.3 (0–13) | ||||
| Cardiovascular | 30.1 ± 8.5 (11–74) | 9.3 ± 4.4 (0–45) | 9.4 ± 3.8 (0–26) | 3.5 ± 2.2 (0–15) | ||||
| Coronary | 15.6 ± 5.2 (2–39) | 5.0 ± 2.7 (0–25) | 4.4 ± 2.3 (0–17) | 1.4 ± 1.3 (0–8) | ||||
| Stroke | 10.6 ± 4.0 (1–28) | 3.1 ± 2.3 (0–15) | 2.2 ± 1.6 (0–9) | 1.7 ± 1.4 (0–8) | ||||
| Respiratory | 15.2 ± 5.2 (5–44) | 5.3 ± 3.0 (0–25) | 3.7 ± 2.2 (0–13) | 1.1 ± 1.1 (0–6) | ||||
| COPD | 7.7 ± 3.5 (0–27) | 2.2 ± 1.6 (0–11) | 2.3 ± 1.7 (0–11) | 0.8 ± 0.9 (0–5) | ||||
Summary statistics of ambient air pollutant concentrations in the PRD cities, 2006–2008 [mean (interquartile range)].
| Pollutant | Guangzhou | Foshan | Zhongshan | Zhuhai | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PM10 (μg/m3) | 81.0 (62.0) | 121.3 (89.0) | 64.2 (58.2) | 43.5 (24.8) | ||||
| NO2 (μg/m3) | 53.9 (33.1) | 70.4 (39.1) | 48.4 (42.4) | 38.1 (34.2) | ||||
| O3 (μg/m3) | 78.2 (72.8) | 70.7 (77.3) | 85.7 (70.8) | 85.5 (76.5) | ||||
| SO2 (μg/m3) | 55.2 (35.2) | 95.4 (73.2) | 57.3 (72.1) | 39.5 (40.0) | ||||
| CO (ppm) | 1.35 (0.61) | 1.65 (1.23) | 1.20 (0.87) | 1.29 (0.73) | ||||
| Data are 24-hr averages for PM10, NO2, SO2, and CO and 8-hr (1000 hours to 1800 hours) averages for O3. | ||||||||
Figure 2Box plots of monthly O3, NO2, and PM10 concentrations (μg/m3): averaged data from the five monitoring stations, 2006–2008. Boxes indicate the interquartile range (25th to 75th percentile); lines within boxes indicate medians; whiskers represent 5th and 95th percentile values; and circles represent outliers.
Pearson correlation coefficients between daily air pollutant concentrations, temperature, and RH in the PRD, using city-merged data, 2006–2008.
| Variable | NO2 | PM10 | SO2 | CO | Temperature | RH | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O3 | 0.17 | 0.36 | 0.08 | –0.06 | 0.30 | –0.50 | ||||||
| NO2 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.72 | –0.51 | –0.31 | ||||||
| PM10 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.64 | –0.34 | –0.41 | |||||||
| SO2 | 1.00 | 0.74 | –0.47 | –0.31 | ||||||||
| CO | 1.00 | –0.52 | –0.09 | |||||||||
| Temperature | 1.00 | 0.29 | ||||||||||
ER of mortality associated with a 10-μg/m3 increase in lag 1–2 day O3, NO2, and PM10 concentrations in individual cities based on single-pollutant models [percent (95% CI)].
| Megacity: Guangzhou | Medium-sized cities | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mortality | Pollutant | Foshan | Zhongshan | Zhuhai | ||||||||
| Total (nonaccidental) | O3 | 0.64 (0.42, 0.86) | 0.36 (–0.06, 0.78) | 0.61 (0.22, 1.00) | 0.22 (–0.36, 0.81) | 0.432 | ||||||
| NO2 | 1.66 (1.28, 2.05) | 1.87 (1.40, 2.35) | 1.22 (0.44, 2.01) | 1.39 (–0.09, 2.89) | 0.555 | |||||||
| PM10 | 0.74 (0.53, 0.95) | 0.50 (0.31, 0.69) | 0.44 (–0.02, 0.91) | 0.37 (–0.97, 1.73) | 0.351 | |||||||
| Cardiovascular | O3 | 0.98 (0.61, 1.35) | 0.43 (–0.25, 1.12) | 0.77 (0.19, 1.35) | –0.08 (–1.00, 0.85) | 0.144 | ||||||
| NO2 | 1.92 (1.29, 2.57) | 2.35 (1.59, 3.13) | 1.19 (0.05, 2.34) | 2.22 (–0.09, 4.58) | 0.426 | |||||||
| PM10 | 0.92 (0.58, 1.26) | 0.71 (0.40, 1.01) | 0.45 (–0.23, 1.14) | 0.47 (–1.62, 2.60) | 0.611 | |||||||
| Respiratory | O3 | 0.89 (0.38, 1.41) | 0.46 (–0.43, 1.36) | 0.61 (–0.32, 1.55) | 1.61 (–0.05, 3.30) | 0.631 | ||||||
| NO2 | 2.99 (2.13, 3.86) | 1.60 (0.60, 2.61) | 3.44 (1.67, 5.25) | 2.46 (–1.59, 6.67) | 0.147 | |||||||
| PM10 | 1.20 (0.72, 1.68) | 0.09 (–0.32, 0.50) | 1.00 (–0.09, 2.10) | 2.82 (–0.96, 6.75) | 0.003 | |||||||
ER of nonaccidental mortality associated with a 10-μg/m3 increase in lag 1–2 day O3, NO2, and PM10 concentrations under single- and two-pollutant modelsa based on combined data for four cities in the PRD [percent (95% CI)].
| Pollutant | Method | Total | Cardiovascular | Respiratory | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O3 | Single-pollutant model | 0.81 (0.63, 1.00) | 1.01 (0.71, 1.32) | 1.33 (0.89, 1.76) | ||||
| Adjusted for PM10 | 0.54 (0.34, 0.75) | 0.71 (0.37, 1.05) | 0.87 (0.39, 1.36) | |||||
| Adjusted for NO2 | 0.43 (0.23, 0.64) | 0.62 (0.29, 0.96) | 0.58 (0.10, 1.06) | |||||
| Adjusted for SO2 | 0.70 (0.51, 0.90) | 0.92 (0.60, 1.23) | 1.16 (0.71, 1.61) | |||||
| Adjusted for CO | 0.72 (0.53, 0.91) | 0.89 (0.58, 1.20) | 1.17 (0.72, 1.61) | |||||
| NO2 | Single-pollutant model | 1.95 (1.62, 2.29) | 2.12 (1.58, 2.65) | 3.48 (2.73, 4.23) | ||||
| Adjusted for O3 | 1.63 (1.27, 2.00) | 1.67 (1.08, 2.25) | 3.07 (2.25, 3.89) | |||||
| PM10 | Single-pollutant model | 0.79 (0.62, 0.96) | 0.91 (0.64, 1.19) | 1.26 (0.88, 1.65) | ||||
| Adjusted for O3 | 0.58 (0.39, 0.76) | 0.64 (0.34, 0.95) | 0.93 (0.51, 1.36) | |||||
ER of mortality associated with a 10-μg/m3 increase in lag 1–2 day O3 concentrations by O3 exposure period,a under single- and two-pollutant models, using city-merged data [percent (95% CI)].
| Mortality | Method | Peak period | Nonpeak period | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Single-pollutant model | 0.65 (0.27, 1.02) | 0.92 (0.69, 1.16) | |||
| Adjusted by PM10 | 0.77 (0.32, 1.22) | 0.64 (0.39, 0.89) | ||||
| Cardiovascular | Single-pollutant model | 0.96 (0.35, 1.58) | 1.06 (0.69, 1.44) | |||
| Adjusted by PM10 | 1.33 (0.59, 2.08) | 0.67 (0.27, 1.07) | ||||
| Respiratory | Single-pollutant model | 0.24 (–0.63, 1.13) | 2.00 (1.47, 2.53)* | |||
| Adjusted by PM10 | 0.08 (–0.98, 1.16) | 1.62 (1.05, 2.20)* | ||||