OBJECTIVES: The descending pain inhibitory system is impaired in chronic pain and it is important to know how analgesics interact with this system. The aim of this human experimental pain, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 3 way cross-over study was to investigate the effect of 2 different opioids on descending pain inhibition using conditioning pain modulation (CPM) as a screening tool. METHODS:Twenty-two healthy male volunteers were randomized to 72 hours of treatment with transdermal patches of fentanyl (25 μg/h), buprenorphine (20 μg/h), or placebo. The CPM was induced by immersing the hand into cold (3.0 ± 0.3°C) water and the evoked pain was continuously rated on a visual analogue scale (VAS). The test stimulus [pressure pain tolerance threshold (PPTol)] was applied to the contra-lateral arm. The CPM test was performed at baseline, 24, 48, and 72 hours after application of the patches. RESULTS: The opioid treatments did not significantly (F=2.249; P=0.07) modulate the PPTol over the treatment period compared with placebo. The CPM-evoked PPTol increases (percentage increase from what was obtained at the baseline before patch application) were significantly enhanced by buprenorphine (P=0.004) and fentanyl (P=0.005) compared with placebo, with no differences between the 2 active drugs. Fentanyl significantly attenuated the time to cold water-evoked VAS peak compared with placebo (P=0.005), and the same trend was observed for buprenorphine (P=0.06). The VAS pain intensity was not affected. DISCUSSION: The opioids buprenorphine and fentanyl significantly potentiate the effect of descending pain inhibition in healthy volunteers.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: The descending pain inhibitory system is impaired in chronic pain and it is important to know how analgesics interact with this system. The aim of this human experimental pain, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 3 way cross-over study was to investigate the effect of 2 different opioids on descending pain inhibition using conditioning pain modulation (CPM) as a screening tool. METHODS: Twenty-two healthy male volunteers were randomized to 72 hours of treatment with transdermal patches of fentanyl (25 μg/h), buprenorphine (20 μg/h), or placebo. The CPM was induced by immersing the hand into cold (3.0 ± 0.3°C) water and the evoked pain was continuously rated on a visual analogue scale (VAS). The test stimulus [pressure pain tolerance threshold (PPTol)] was applied to the contra-lateral arm. The CPM test was performed at baseline, 24, 48, and 72 hours after application of the patches. RESULTS: The opioid treatments did not significantly (F=2.249; P=0.07) modulate the PPTol over the treatment period compared with placebo. The CPM-evoked PPTol increases (percentage increase from what was obtained at the baseline before patch application) were significantly enhanced by buprenorphine (P=0.004) and fentanyl (P=0.005) compared with placebo, with no differences between the 2 active drugs. Fentanyl significantly attenuated the time to cold water-evoked VAS peak compared with placebo (P=0.005), and the same trend was observed for buprenorphine (P=0.06). The VAS pain intensity was not affected. DISCUSSION: The opioids buprenorphine and fentanyl significantly potentiate the effect of descending pain inhibition in healthy volunteers.
Authors: Pieter Okkerse; Guido van Amerongen; Marieke L de Kam; Jasper Stevens; Richard P Butt; Rachel Gurrell; Albert Dahan; Joop M van Gerven; Justin L Hay; Geert Jan Groeneveld Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2017-01-09 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Stephen Bruehl; A Vania Apkarian; Jane C Ballantyne; Ann Berger; David Borsook; Wen G Chen; John T Farrar; Jennifer A Haythornthwaite; Susan D Horn; Michael J Iadarola; Charles E Inturrisi; Lixing Lao; Sean Mackey; Jianren Mao; Andrea Sawczuk; George R Uhl; James Witter; Clifford J Woolf; Jon-Kar Zubieta; Yu Lin Journal: J Pain Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Carolina Valencia; Lindsay L Kindler; Roger B Fillingim; Steven Z George Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2013-06-10 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Søren S Olesen; Carina Graversen; Stefan A W Bouwense; Harry van Goor; Oliver H G Wilder-Smith; Asbjørn M Drewes Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-03-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Pernille Ravn; Erik L Secher; Ulrik Skram; Trine Therkildsen; Lona L Christrup; Mads U Werner Journal: J Pain Res Date: 2013-01-09 Impact factor: 3.133