Literature DB >> 22156887

Indications and outcomes following complex abdominal reconstruction with component separation combined with porcine acellular dermal matrix reinforcement.

Ketan M Patel1, Maurice Y Nahabedian, Margaret Gatti, Parag Bhanot.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Component separation (CS) is an effective technique for complex abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR). Reinforcement of the repair with mesh can add durability. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the indications and outcomes following CS combined with a porcine acellular dermal matrix (PADM) for reinforcement.
METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent complex AWR at the authors' institution was completed between 2007 and 2010. Patients with complex hernias who underwent CS in conjunction with PADM as an underlay were included. The PADM used in this cohort was Strattice (LifeCell Corporation, Branchburg, NJ). Patient demographics, indications, perioperative details, postoperative care, and long-term outcomes were reviewed.
RESULTS: A total of 78 patients were identified as having PADM implanted for AWR. Of this cohort, 41 patients met the criteria as having a CS to achieve midline closure, with the PADM placed as reinforcement in an underlay manner. These patients were classified as grade II (33; 80.5%), grade III (4; 9.8%), and grade IV (4; 9.8%). Average patient age was 57.6 years (range, 33-80), and average body mass index (BMI) was 35.8 kg/m2 (range, 21.6-52.1). Patient comorbidities included coronary artery disease (19; 46.3%), diabetes mellitus (14; 34.2%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (6; 14.6%), and chronic steroid use (2; 4.9%). Previous mesh infection occurred in 9 (28.1%). The mean defect diameter was found to be 14.3 cm. Perforator preservation of the subcutaneous flaps was performed in 34 (82.9%) patients. A concomitant panniculectomy was performed in 9 (22%) patients. A staged approach was used in 3 (7.3%) patients. The overall complication rate was 24.4%. Strattice exposure occurred in 5 (12.2%) patients. All patients went on to heal wounds without explantation.No hernia recurrences or symptomatic bulges were observed in the follow-up period of 474 days (range, 194-1017 days). No significant predictors of complications were identified.
CONCLUSIONS: Strattice is an effective adjunct to AWR when used as reinforcement during CS for a wide variety of indications. Complication rates remain low in complex patients. In addition, Strattice appears to add durability to midline reconstructions with no recurrences during the follow-up period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22156887     DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31822f997b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  18 in total

1.  Outcome in porcine acellular dermal matrix reinforcement of infected abdominal wall defects: a prospective study.

Authors:  P Zerbib; R Caiazzo; G Piessen; M Rogosnitzky; C Séquier; D Koriche; S Truant; E Boleslawski; J P Chambon; F R Pruvot
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Analysis of perioperative factors associated with increased cost following abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR).

Authors:  John P Fischer; Ari M Wes; Jason D Wink; Jonas A Nelson; Jeff I Rohrbach; Benjamin M Braslow; Stephen J Kovach
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 3.  Endoscopic versus open component separation: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Noah J Switzer; Mark A Dykstra; Richdeep S Gill; Stephanie Lim; Erica Lester; Christopher de Gara; Xinzhe Shi; Daniel W Birch; Shahzeer Karmali
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  A meta-analysis comparing open anterior component separation with posterior component separation and transversus abdominis release in the repair of midline ventral hernias.

Authors:  J D Hodgkinson; C A Leo; Y Maeda; P Bassett; S M Oke; C J Vaizey; J Warusavitarne
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Improved outcomes in the management of high-risk incisional hernias utilizing biological mesh and soft-tissue reconstruction: a single center experience.

Authors:  J R A Skipworth; S Vyas; L Uppal; D Floyd; A Shankar
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Incisional reinforcement in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Timothy F Feldmann; Monica T Young; Alessio Pigazzi
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2014-12

Review 7.  Porcine acellular dermal matrix (PADM) vascularises after exposure in open necrotic wounds seen after complex hernia repair.

Authors:  Arvind U Gowda; Sarah M Chang; Karan Chopra; Jamil A Matthews; Jennifer Sabino; Jeffrey A Stromberg; Hamid R Zahiri; Joel Pinczewski; Luther H Holton; Ronald P Silverman; Devinder P Singh
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  [Use of biological meshes in abdominal wall reconstruction. Results of a survey in Germany].

Authors:  G Woeste; F-E Isemer; C W Strey; H-M Schardey; H Thielemann; A Mihaljevic; J Kleeff; J Kleef
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  Component separation with porcine acellular dermal reinforcement is superior to traditional bridged mesh repairs in the open repair of significant midline ventral hernia defects.

Authors:  Bryan Richmond; Adam Ubert; Rudy Judhan; Jonathan King; Tanner Harrah; Benjamin Dyer; Stephanie Thompson
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 0.688

10.  Use of decellularized scaffolds combined with hyaluronic acid and basic fibroblast growth factor for skin tissue engineering.

Authors:  Zhengzheng Wu; Lina Fan; Bin Xu; Yongliang Lin; Peng Zhang; Xing Wei
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 3.845

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.