Literature DB >> 22156664

A randomised trial comparing the antibacterial effects of dentine primers against bacteria in natural root caries.

S L Rolland1, J F McCabe, S Imazato, A W G Walls.   

Abstract

As people are living longer and retaining their teeth into old age, root caries is an increasingly significant problem. A minimally invasive treatment strategy, involving sealing the root caries lesion with an antibacterial resin sealant, could be highly beneficial. The aim of this study was to compare the antibacterial properties of the primers of two proprietary dentine bonding agents, Clearfil SE Bond (SE; Kuraray Medical, Japan) and Clearfil Protect Bond (PB; Kuraray Medical), which contains the antibacterial monomer methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium bromide. Fifty-two root caries lesions were identified and randomly assigned to a primer. The lesion was cleaned, isolated, sampled with a sharp spoon excavator, a primer applied and a second sample taken. Samples were transported in fastidious anaerobe broth, vortex-dispersed and serial dilutions inoculated onto selective agars. Reduction in colony-forming units (CFU, %) after primer application was calculated for both primers for bacterial growth on each selective agar and compared to a hypothesised mean of 100% (one-sample t test, p < 0.05). No significant differences between primers were seen, indicating efficient bacterial elimination by both materials. Comparing percent reduction between SE and PB for each agar (Mann-Whitney test, p < 0.05), a significantly greater CFU reduction by PB was seen for streptococci but not other bacteria. More lesions exhibited bacterial growth and several lesions demonstrated marked bacterial growth after treatment with SE compared with PB. Therefore, PB appears to exhibit superior antimicrobial properties, particularly against streptococci. Both primers are highly antibacterial towards root caries bacteria and may therefore be suitable for minimally invasive treatment.
Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22156664     DOI: 10.1159/000334623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Caries Res        ISSN: 0008-6568            Impact factor:   4.056


  6 in total

1.  How to Intervene in the Root Caries Process? Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.

Authors:  Hendrik Meyer-Lueckel; Vita Machiulskiene; Rodrigo A Giacaman
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Lab-Test(®) 4: Dental caries and bacteriological analysis.

Authors:  Francesca Cura; Annalisa Palmieri; Ambra Girardi; Marcella Martinelli; Luca Scapoli; Francesco Carinci
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2012-12

3.  Correlates of root caries experience in middle-aged and older adults in the Northwest Practice-based REsearch Collaborative in Evidence-based DENTistry research network.

Authors:  Donald L Chi; Joel H Berg; Amy S Kim; JoAnna Scott
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.634

4.  Bactericidal and Bioactive Dental Composites.

Authors:  Xanthippi Chatzistavrou; Anna Lefkelidou; Lambrini Papadopoulou; Eleni Pavlidou; Konstantinos M Paraskevopoulos; J Christopher Fenno; Susan Flannagan; Carlos González-Cabezas; Nikos Kotsanos; Petros Papagerakis
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 5.  Impact of direct restorative dental materials on surface root caries treatment. Evidence based and current materials development: A systematic review.

Authors:  Watcharapong Tonprasong; Masanao Inokoshi; Makoto Shimizubata; Mao Yamamoto; Keita Hatano; Shunsuke Minakuchi
Journal:  Jpn Dent Sci Rev       Date:  2021-12-29

Review 6.  Antibacterial agents in composite restorations for the prevention of dental caries.

Authors:  Tatiana Pereira-Cenci; Maximiliano S Cenci; Zbys Fedorowicz; Marina Azevedo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-12-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.