Literature DB >> 2215608

The effect of ursodiol on the efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of gallstones. The Dornier National Biliary Lithotripsy Study.

L J Schoenfield1, G Berci, R L Carnovale, W Casarella, P Caslowitz, D Chumley, R C Davis, J Y Gillenwater, A C Johnson, R S Jones.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the treatment of gallstones with extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy, the bile acid ursodiol is administered to dissolve the gallstone fragments. We designed our study to determine the value of administering this agent.
METHODS: At 10 centers, 600 symptomatic patients with three or fewer radiolucent gallstones 5 to 30 mm in diameter, as visualized by oral cholecystography, were randomly assigned to receive ursodiol or placebo for six months, starting one week before lithotripsy.
RESULTS: The stones were fragmented in 97 percent of all patients, and the fragments were less than or equal to 5 mm in diameter in 46.8 percent. On the basis of an intention-to-treat analysis of all 600 patients, 21 percent receiving ursodiol and 9 percent receiving placebo (P less than 0.0001) had gallbladders that were free of stones after six months. Among those with completely radiolucent solitary stones less than 20 mm in diameter, 35 percent of the patients receiving ursodiol and 18 percent of those receiving placebo (P less than 0.001) were free of stones after six months. Biliary pain, usually mild, occurred in 73 percent of all patients but in only 13 percent of those who were free of stones after three and six months (P less than 0.01). There were few adverse events. Only diarrhea occurred with a significantly different frequency in the two groups: 32.6 percent were affected in the ursodiol group, as compared with 24.7 percent in the placebo group (P less than 0.04). Severe biliary pain occurred in 1.5 percent of all patients, acute cholecystitis in 1.0 percent, and acute pancreatitis in 1.5 percent; endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed in 0.5 percent, and cholecystectomy in 2.5 percent.
CONCLUSIONS: Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy with ursodiol was more effective than lithotripsy alone for the treatment of symptomatic gallstones, and equally safe. Treatment was more effective for solitary than multiple stones, radiolucent than slightly calcified stones, and smaller than larger stones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2215608     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199011013231804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  20 in total

1.  The economic burden of gallstone lithotripsy. Will cost determine its fate?

Authors:  W H Nealon; F Urrutia; D Fleming; J C Thompson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Gallstone ileus successfully treated by shock-wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  M Sackmann; J Holl; M Haerlin; T Sauerbruch; R Hoermann; J Heinkelein; G Paumgartner
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Lithotripsy versus cholecystectomy for management of gallstones. A decision analysis by Markov process.

Authors:  A Sonnenberg; G A Derfus; K H Soergel
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Repeated piezoelectric lithotripsy for gallstones with and without ursodeoxycholic acid dissolution: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Y Tsuchiya; F Ishihara; G Kajiyama; S Nakazawa; M Otho; H Tanimura; Y Akura; M Harada; M Hihara; Y Kawai
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 5.  Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2016.

Authors:  Susumu Tazuma; Michiaki Unno; Yoshinori Igarashi; Kazuo Inui; Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Masahiro Kai; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Hiroyuki Maguchi; Toshiyuki Mori; Koji Yamaguchi; Shomei Ryozawa; Yuji Nimura; Naotaka Fujita; Keiichi Kubota; Junichi Shoda; Masami Tabata; Tetsuya Mine; Kentaro Sugano; Mamoru Watanabe; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 7.527

6.  Gall stone pulverisation strategy in patients treated with extracorporeal lithotripsy and follow up results of maintenance treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid.

Authors:  M Boscaini; M Piccinni-Leopardi; F Andreotti; A Montori
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Role of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  R L van der Hul; P W Plaisier; O T Terpstra; H A Bruining
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Effect of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ursodeoxycholic acid on gallbladder motility.

Authors:  R D Rothstein; W R Brugge; P F Malet
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  ESWL and oral dissolution therapy. What factors influence results?

Authors:  A Buttmann; H E Adamek; J Weber; J F Riemann
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Is biliary lithogenesis affected by length and implantation of cystic duct? Study of 270 patients with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  F X Caroli-Bosc; J F Demarquay; M Conio; C Deveau; P Hastier; A Harris; R Dumas; J P Delmont
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.