Literature DB >> 22155485

Use of 13 disease registries in 5 countries demonstrates the potential to use outcome data to improve health care's value.

Stefan Larsson1, Peter Lawyer, Göran Garellick, Bertil Lindahl, Mats Lundström.   

Abstract

As health care systems worldwide struggle with rising costs, a consensus is emerging to refocus reform efforts on value, as determined by the evaluation of patient outcomes relative to costs. One method of using outcome data to improve health care value is the disease registry. An international study of thirteen registries in five countries (Australia, Denmark, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States) suggests that by making outcome data transparent to both practitioners and the public, well-managed registries enable medical professionals to engage in continuous learning and to identify and share best clinical practices. The apparent result: improved health outcomes, often at lower cost. For example, we calculate that if the United States had a registry for hip replacement surgery comparable to one in Sweden that enabled reductions in the rates at which these surgeries are performed a second time to replace or repair hip prostheses, the United States would avoid $2 billion of an expected $24 billion in total costs for these surgeries in 2015.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22155485     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0762

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  46 in total

Review 1.  The importance of clinical pathways and protocols in pediatric nephrology.

Authors:  Cherry Mammen; Douglas G Matsell; Kevin V Lemley
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 3.714

2.  A comprehensive stroke center patient registry: advantages, limitations, and lessons learned.

Authors:  James E Siegler; Amelia K Boehme; Adrianne M Dorsey; Dominique J Monlezun; Alex J George; Amir Shaban; H Jeremy Bockholt; Karen C Albright; Sheryl Martin-Schild
Journal:  Med Student Res J       Date:  2013-05-31

Review 3.  Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) position statement of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR): general principles of IBD management.

Authors:  G Pellino; D S Keller; G M Sampietro; V Annese; M Carvello; V Celentano; C Coco; F Colombo; N Cracco; F Di Candido; M Franceschi; S Laureti; G Mattioli; L Pio; G Sciaudone; G Sica; V Villanacci; R Zinicola; S Leone; S Danese; A Spinelli; G Delaini; F Selvaggi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-01-25       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 4.  [The IRIS® Registry : Purpose and perspectives. German Version].

Authors:  D W Parke Ii; F Lum; W L Rich
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 5.  The IRIS® Registry : Purpose and perspectives.

Authors:  D W Parke Ii; F Lum; W L Rich
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  Rapid Development of Specialty Population Registries and Quality Measures from Electronic Health Record Data*. An Agile Framework.

Authors:  Vaishnavi Kannan; Jason S Fish; Jacqueline M Mutz; Angela R Carrington; Ki Lai; Lisa S Davis; Josh E Youngblood; Mark R Rauschuber; Kathryn A Flores; Evan J Sara; Deepa G Bhat; DuWayne L Willett
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.176

Review 7.  Dementia registries around the globe and their applications: A systematic review.

Authors:  Karolina Krysinska; Perminder S Sachdev; John Breitner; Miia Kivipelto; Walter Kukull; Henry Brodaty
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 21.566

Review 8.  Clinical disease registries in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Reza Ashrafi; Hussain Hussain; Robert Brisk; Leanne Boardman; Clive Weston
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-06-26

9.  The intriguing future of pharmacoepidemiology.

Authors:  Björn Wettermark
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  National quality registries: how to improve the quality of data?

Authors:  Fieke Hoeijmakers; Naomi Beck; Michel W J M Wouters; Hubert A Prins; Willem H Steup
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.