Mario Cazzola1, Sreedhar Anapurapu, Clive P Page. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Unit of Respiratory Clinical Pharmacology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy. mario.cazzola@uniroma2.it
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Respiratory tract infections are common and remain a major source of morbidity, mortality and economic cost worldwide, despite advances in modern medicine. One treatment approach is to non-specifically increase the immune response or augment innate defense mechanisms through the use of bacterial lysates. Polyvalent Mechanical Bacterial Lysate (PMBL) is a bacterial lysate made from a wide range of pathogenic bacteria, including all of the most commonly occurring pathogens of the upper and lower respiratory tract obtained by mechanical lysis. AIM: To test the available evidence that PMBL is able to prevent respiratory tract infections. METHODS: A number of studies investigating randomized comparisons of PMBL (active) with placebo or no treatment (control) were selected for analysis. The primary outcome measure was the prevention of exacerbations or acute respiratory tract infection. The results were expressed as relative risk (RR) and the number of patients needed to treat for one to benefit (NNTB). RESULTS: Data from 2557 patients from 15 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was investigated. PMBL induced a significant reduction of infections vs placebo (RR -0.513; 95% CI; -0.722 - -0.303; p = 0.00). The NNTB was 1.15. The RR was always in favor of PMBL (in recurrent respiratory infections other than COPD, chronic bronchitis and tuberculosis, RR -0.502; 95% CI -0.824 - -0.181; in children RR -2.204; 95% CI -3.260 - -1.147; in COPD or chronic bronchitis, RR -0.404; 95% CI -0.864-0.057; in tuberculosis, RR -0.502; 95% CI -0.890 - -0.114). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present meta-analysis suggest that PBML is effective in both in children and in adults in preventing respiratory tract infections. Our current meta-analysis shows that there is a trend with PBML toward clinically significant results in patients with COPD but it did not quite achieve statistical significance due to the small number of COPD studies. Copyright Â
BACKGROUND:Respiratory tract infections are common and remain a major source of morbidity, mortality and economic cost worldwide, despite advances in modern medicine. One treatment approach is to non-specifically increase the immune response or augment innate defense mechanisms through the use of bacterial lysates. Polyvalent Mechanical Bacterial Lysate (PMBL) is a bacterial lysate made from a wide range of pathogenic bacteria, including all of the most commonly occurring pathogens of the upper and lower respiratory tract obtained by mechanical lysis. AIM: To test the available evidence that PMBL is able to prevent respiratory tract infections. METHODS: A number of studies investigating randomized comparisons of PMBL (active) with placebo or no treatment (control) were selected for analysis. The primary outcome measure was the prevention of exacerbations or acute respiratory tract infection. The results were expressed as relative risk (RR) and the number of patients needed to treat for one to benefit (NNTB). RESULTS: Data from 2557 patients from 15 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was investigated. PMBL induced a significant reduction of infections vs placebo (RR -0.513; 95% CI; -0.722 - -0.303; p = 0.00). The NNTB was 1.15. The RR was always in favor of PMBL (in recurrent respiratory infections other than COPD, chronic bronchitis and tuberculosis, RR -0.502; 95% CI -0.824 - -0.181; in children RR -2.204; 95% CI -3.260 - -1.147; in COPD or chronic bronchitis, RR -0.404; 95% CI -0.864-0.057; in tuberculosis, RR -0.502; 95% CI -0.890 - -0.114). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present meta-analysis suggest that PBML is effective in both in children and in adults in preventing respiratory tract infections. Our current meta-analysis shows that there is a trend with PBML toward clinically significant results in patients with COPD but it did not quite achieve statistical significance due to the small number of COPD studies. Copyright Â
Authors: Alfonso Maria Varricchio; Michele Capasso; Antonio Della Volpe; Luigi Malafronte; Nicola Mansi; Attilio Varricchio; Giorgio Ciprandi Journal: Ital J Pediatr Date: 2014-11-23 Impact factor: 2.638
Authors: Stefano Carlone; Michele Minenna; Paride Morlino; Luigi Mosca; Franco Pasqua; Riccardo Pela; Pietro Schino; Alberto Tubaldi; Emmanuele Tupputi; Fernando De Benedetto Journal: Multidiscip Respir Med Date: 2014-11-19
Authors: Geertje M de Boer; Gert-Jan Braunstahl; Esmee K van der Ploeg; Cathelijne M van Zelst; Alie van Bruggen; Guido Epping; Menno van Nimwegen; Gert Verhoeven; Erwin Birnie; Bianca M Boxma-de Klerk; Marjolein J W de Bruijn; Ralph Stadhouders; Rudi W Hendriks; Gerdien A Tramper-Stranders Journal: Clin Exp Allergy Date: 2021-08-06 Impact factor: 5.401