Literature DB >> 22154633

The association between tumour density and prostate cancer recurrence following radical prostatectomy.

Luke T Lavallée1, Rodney H Breau, Mark A Preston, Gayanna Raju, Christopher Morash, Steve Doucette, Ronald G Gerridzen, James Eastham, Ilias Cagiannos.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Tumour density (TD) may be an independent prognostic factor in men with prostate cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between prostate cancer TD and recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1995 and 2007, 645 patients from The Ottawa Hospital or Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center who had cancer and prostate volumes measured from radical prostatectomy specimens. Tumour density was defined as the relative tumour to prostate volume (tumour volume/prostate volume) and recurrence was defined as a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >0.2 ng/mL and rising, or postoperative use of radiation or hormonal therapy. Associations between TD and recurrence are adjusted for preoperative PSA, prostatectomy Gleason sum, tumour stage and margin status.
RESULTS: Median follow-up was 40.8 months. Tumour density was associated with preoperative PSA, Gleason sum, tumour stage and surgical margin status (all p < 0.0001). As a continuous variable, TD predicted recurrence-free survival (adjusted HR 1.34 per 10% increase in TD; p = 0.04). As a categorical variable, the group of patients with a TD of >10% had a 2.7 times greater hazard of recurrence compared to patients with a TD <5% (95%CI 1.41, 5.19; p = 0.003). Despite the independent association between TD and recurrence, the clinical value of TD remains in question as the discriminative performance (area under the curve) of predictive models only improved from 0.865 to 0.876.
CONCLUSIONS: Prostate cancer TD is associated with known prognostic factors and is also independently predictive of recurrence following radical prostatectomy.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22154633      PMCID: PMC3235204          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.11061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  22 in total

1.  Cancer statistics, 2010.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Jiaquan Xu; Elizabeth Ward
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  Percentage carcinoma as a measure of prostatic tumor size in radical prostatectomy tissues.

Authors:  P A Humphrey; R T Vollmer
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  Minimal tumor volume may provide additional prognostic information in good performance patients after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Thomas J Guzzo; Manish A Vira; William Neway; Wei-Ting Hwang; John Tomaszewski; Keith VanArsdalen; Alan J Wein; S Bruce Malkowicz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 4.  Radical prostatectomy reigns supreme.

Authors:  Heidi J Rayala; Jerome P Richie
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.990

5.  Assessment of clinical and pathologic characteristics predisposing to disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy in men with pathologically organ-confined prostate cancer.

Authors:  R Jüri Palisaar; Markus Graefen; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Peter G Hammerer; Edith Huland; Alexander Haese; Salvator Fernandez; Andreas Erbersdobler; Rolf-Peter Henke; Hartwig Huland
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Validation of the Kattan preoperative nomogram for prostate cancer recurrence using a community based cohort: results from cancer of the prostate strategic urological research endeavor (capsure).

Authors:  Kirsten L Greene; Maxwell V Meng; Eric P Elkin; Matthew R Cooperberg; David J Pasta; Michael W Kattan; Katrine Wallace; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Percent tumor involvement and risk of biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Edward N Rampersaud; Leon Sun; Judd W Moul; John Madden; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  A simple technique for calculation of the volume of prostatic adenocarcinomas in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  Kien T Mail; Ghadeer Mokhtar; Bruce F Burns; D Garth Perkins; Hossein M Yazdi; William A Stinson
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.250

9.  Prognostic significance of tumor volume after radical prostatectomy: a multivariate analysis of pathological prognostic factors.

Authors:  Laurent Salomon; Olivier Levrel; Aristotelis G Anastasiadis; Jacques Irani; Alexandre De La Taille; Fabien Saint; Dimitri Vordos; Antony Cicco; Andras Hoznek; Dominique Chopin; Claude Clément Abbou
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Prostate volume and the incidence of extraprostatic extension: is there a relation?

Authors:  Rajiv Yadav; Jiangling J Tu; Jay Jhaveri; Robert A Leung; Sandhya Rao; Ashutosh K Tewari
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.942

View more
  1 in total

1.  The pursuit of the "perfect" biomarker in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.862

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.